Penataan Jalur Pejalan Kaki Berdasarkan Konsep Walkability di Jalan Merdeka Kota Malang

Pratiwi, Irene Dhita (2016) Penataan Jalur Pejalan Kaki Berdasarkan Konsep Walkability di Jalan Merdeka Kota Malang. Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.

Abstract

Jalan Merdeka merupakan kawasan perdagangan dan ruang terbuka publik yang menjadi tarikan besar dan mendorong pergerakan masyarakat termasuk pejalan kaki di Kota Malang. Pergerakan pejalan kaki yang tinggi seharusnya diseimbangkan dengan ketersediaan sarana dan prasarana yang memadai, hal ini untuk menciptakan jalur pejalan kaki yang walkable yaitu jalur pejalan kaki yang dapat memberikan kenyamanan, keamanan dan keramahan bagi pejalan kaki. Fungsi utama adanya jalur pejalan kaki yaitu sebagai tempat pejalan kaki dapat bergerak dan berpindah dari satu tempat ke tempat lainnya dengan aman, nyaman serta tanpa rasa takut baik terhadap sesama pejalan kaki maupun terhadap kendaraan. Jalur pejalan kaki harus mempertimbangkan lebar, perkerasan serta fasilitas-fasilitas yang menunjang seperti penerangan jalan, tempat sampah serta fasilitas pelengkap jalan lainnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan rencana penataan jalur pejalan kaki berdasarkan konsep walkability. Penelitian ini menggunakan pedoman dari Permen PU Nomor 03/PRT/M/2014 untuk mengetahui kinerja jalur pejalan kaki dengan menghitung arus, kepadatan, ruang jalur pejalan kaki dan rasio v/c. dan standar US Department Health and Human Service untuk mengetahui indeks walkability serta Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) untuk mengetahui prioritas perbaikan jalur pejalan kaki. Penilaian walkability dilakukan berdasarkan persepsi pengguna dan ketentuan standar. Parameter yang digunakan terdiri dari 9 yaitu ketersediaan jalur pejalan kaki, konflik pejalan kaki, penyeberangan, pemeliharaan, ukuran jalur pejalan kaki, buffer, aksesibilitas, estetika dan peneduh dengan masing-masing parameter memiliki bobot yang berbeda-beda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Jalan Merdeka Selatan dan Jalan Merdeka Timur memiliki kinerja jalur pejalan kaki paling buruk yaitu B pada saat weekday sedangkan pada saat weekend, Jalan Merdeka Timur memiliki kinerja jalur pejalan kaki paling buruk yaitu E . Jalur pejalan kaki di Jalan Merdeka memiliki indeks walkability yaitu cukup walkable dengan nilai 40-69. Rencana penataan jalur pejalan kaki di Jalan Merdeka memiliki prioritas perbaikan yang berbeda-beda pada setiap ruas jalan, umumnya perbaikan dilakukan pada penambahan lampu penerangan, tempat sampah dan jalur difabel. Hal ini dikarenakan kondisi eksistingnya masih belum terdapat fasilitas-fasilitas tersebut.

English Abstract

Merdeka street is a commercial area and public open space that becomes a big attraction and encourages the movement of the public including pedestrian in Malang city. A high pedestrian movement should be balanced with the availability of adequate facilities and infrastructure, this is to create a walkable pedestrian ways that is pedestrian ways can provide comfort, safety and sociability for pedestrians. The main function a pedestrian ways is a place where pedestrians can move from one place to another safely, comfortably and without fear either against fellow walkers as well as to the vehicle. Pedestrian ways should consider width, pavement and facilities that support such as street lighting, dustbin, and other complementary facilities.The main purpose of the research is providing a plan of pedestrian ways which is based on the concept of walkability. This research used guidlines from Permen PU number 03/PRT/M/2014 to know the level of service pedestrian ways by calculating the flow, density, space pedestrian ways and ratio v / c and standard of the US Department Health and Human Service to find out index of walkability and Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) to know the priority improvements of pedestrian ways. Walkability assessment is done based on pedestrians perception and standard. Parameters used consisted of 9 is the availability of pedestrian ways, pedestrian conflict, crossing, maintenance, measurement of pedestrian paths, buffers, accessibility, aesthetics and shade with each parameter has a different weight. The results showed that Merdeka Selatan street and Merdeka Timur street has the worst level of service is B on the weekday while on the weekend, Merdeka Timur street has the worst level of service is E. Pedestrian ways on Merdeka street has index of walkability is quite walkable with score 40-69. The planning of restructuring pedestrian ways on Merdeka street has a different priority repair every street , the addition of priority restructuring is in lighting, trash and disability paths. This is because the condition of existing is still not there are facilities yet

Item Type: Thesis (Sarjana)
Identification Number: SKR/FT/2016/626/051608391
Subjects: 300 Social sciences > 307 Communities > 307.1 Planning and development > 307.121 6 City planning
Divisions: Fakultas Teknik > Teknik Perencanaa Wilayah dan Kota
Depositing User: Yusuf Dwi N.
Date Deposited: 24 Aug 2016 11:07
Last Modified: 14 Feb 2022 06:13
URI: http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/144864
[thumbnail of 3._LEMBAR_PENGESAHAN.pdf] Text
3._LEMBAR_PENGESAHAN.pdf

Download (1MB)
[thumbnail of 4._Identitas_Tim_Penguji_Skripsi.pdf] Text
4._Identitas_Tim_Penguji_Skripsi.pdf

Download (1MB)
[thumbnail of 5._LEMBAR_ORISINALITAS.pdf]
Preview
Text
5._LEMBAR_ORISINALITAS.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 6._LEMBAR_PERUNTUKAN.pdf]
Preview
Text
6._LEMBAR_PERUNTUKAN.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 7._LEMBAR_RINGKASAN.pdf] Text
7._LEMBAR_RINGKASAN.pdf

Download (1MB)
[thumbnail of 8._LEMBAR_SUMMARY.pdf] Text
8._LEMBAR_SUMMARY.pdf

Download (1MB)
[thumbnail of 9._PENGANTAR.pdf] Text
9._PENGANTAR.pdf

Download (1MB)
[thumbnail of 10.DAFTAR_ISI.pdf] Text
10.DAFTAR_ISI.pdf

Download (1MB)
[thumbnail of 11._DAFTAR_TABEL.pdf]
Preview
Text
11._DAFTAR_TABEL.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 14._BAB_I.pdf] Text
14._BAB_I.pdf

Download (2MB)
[thumbnail of 12._DAFTAR_GAMBAR.pdf] Text
12._DAFTAR_GAMBAR.pdf

Download (1MB)
[thumbnail of 13._DAFTAR_LAMPIRAN.pdf]
Preview
Text
13._DAFTAR_LAMPIRAN.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 16._BAB_III.pdf] Text
16._BAB_III.pdf

Download (3MB)
[thumbnail of 15._BAB_II.pdf] Text
15._BAB_II.pdf

Download (3MB)
[thumbnail of 17._BAB_IVc.pdf] Text
17._BAB_IVc.pdf

Download (5MB)
[thumbnail of 18._BAB_V.pdf] Text
18._BAB_V.pdf

Download (1MB)
[thumbnail of 19._DAFTAR_PUSTAKA.pdf] Text
19._DAFTAR_PUSTAKA.pdf

Download (1MB)
[thumbnail of 20._LAMPIRAN_BARU.pdf]
Preview
Text
20._LAMPIRAN_BARU.pdf

Download (3MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 21._KUISIONER.pdf] Text
21._KUISIONER.pdf

Download (1MB)
[thumbnail of JURNAL.pdf] Text
JURNAL.pdf

Download (2MB)
[thumbnail of 2._LEMBAR_JUDUL.pdf]
Preview
Text
2._LEMBAR_JUDUL.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 1._SAMPUL.pdf] Text
1._SAMPUL.pdf

Download (1MB)

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item