Dewi, Amalia Laksmita (2017) Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Desain Busana Berdasarkan Uu No 31 Tahun 2000 Tentang Desain Industri Di Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan Hukum Ketentuan Undang-Undang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Di Amerika Dan Eropa ). Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
Banyaknya kasus plagiasi atau iktikad tidak baik oleh individu maupun perusahaan besar yang tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap desain busana tentu menyebabkan kerugian yang tidak sedikit, hal tersebut terjadi dikarenakan Undang- Undang di Indonesia yang tidak mengatur secara rigid atau jelas sehingga menyebabkan kekaburan dalam hal perlindungan desain busana. Apalagi desain busana merupakan suatu hal yang unik sehingga memerlukan perlindungan secara khusus. Beberapa Undang-Undang yang tersedia saat ini masih kurang mengatur dan sesuai dengan kebutuhan perlindungan desain busana di Indonesia, hal ini berbeda dengan Negara lain missal Amerika dan Eropa yang lebih khusus mengatur permasalahan ini. Berdasarkan latar belakang masalah yang telah diuraikan di atas, maka permasalahan yang akan dikaji atau diteliti lebih lanjut dalam penelitian ini dapat dirumuskan adalah, bagaimana perlindungan hukum desain busana di Indonesia berdasarkan UU No 31 Tahun 2000 tentang Desain Industri dan UU No 28 tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta? Serta bagaimana perbandingan perlindungan hukum desain busana menurut ketentuan hukum di Indonesia, Amerika, dan Eropa, lalu bagaimana implikasi serta kendalanya jika diterapkan di Indonesia? Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum Yuridis Normatif. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep, dan pendekatan komparatif. Bahan hukum yang digunakan terdiri dari bahan hukum primer berupa peraturan perundang-undangan, bahan hukum sekunder berupa penjelasan undang-undang dan buku-buku ilmu hukum, serta bahan hukum tersier berupa kamus. Teknik analisis bahan hukum dalam penelitian ini menggunakan analisis perundang-undangan dan analisis gramatikal. Berdasarkan permasalahan serta hasil dan pembahasan yang telah diuraikan di atas, maka penulis menarik kesimpulan yaitu produk undang-undang di Indonesia khususnya UU Desain Industri dan UU Hak Cipta masih kurang relevan untuk dijadikan sebagai payung hukum desain busana di Indonesia dikarenakan dalam UU tersebut jangka waktu perlindungannya yang relative lama dan tidak sesuai dengan kebutuhan desain busana yang cenderung
English Abstract
The number of cases of plagiarism or faith is not either by individuals or large companies are not responsible for the design of clothing is certainly cause losses are not small, it happened because law in Indonesia that do not set rigid or clearly causing vagueness in terms of protection of fashion design , Moreover, fashion design is a unique case that requires special protection. Some of the Act provided today is still less set up and in accordance with the needs of fashion design protection in Indonesia, this is different from other countries eg US and Europe are more specifically regulate this issue. Based on the background of the problems described above, the issues to be examined or further examined in this study can be formulated is, how the legal protection of fashion design in Indonesia based on Law No. 31 of 2000 on Industrial Designs and Law No. 28 of 2014 on the Right Create? As well as how it compares to the legal protection of fashion designs according to the provisions of law in Indonesia, America, and Europe, and what are the implications as well as the barriers are to be implemented in Indonesia? This research is normative juridical law. This study uses the approach of legislation, approach to the concept, and comparative approach. Legal materials used consisted of primary legal materials in the form of legislation, secondary law material in the form of an explanation of laws and books of jurisprudence, as well as tertiary legal materials in the form of a dictionary. Mechanical analysis of legal materials in this study using the analysis of legislation and grammatical analysis. Based on the problems and the results and discussion that has been described above, the authors draw the conclusion that the product legislation in Indonesia, particularly the Law of Industrial Designs and the Copyright Act is not relevant to serve as the legal umbrella of fashion design in Indonesia, as in the law of the protection period relatively long and does not correspond to the needs of fashion design that tends to "short life products" other than that of the two laws no single article that specifically regulates the design of clothing, giving rise to ambiguity and confusion in the society. For that there are things that can be used as a role model by referring to the law in the United States and Europe as a model of protection by using the "Unregistered Community Design" is better suited as a fashion design protection.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Sarjana) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | SKR/FH/2017/68/0517036985 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | - |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 346 Private law > 346.04 Property > 346.048 Intangible property |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Nur Cholis |
| Date Deposited: | 05 Oct 2017 04:16 |
| Last Modified: | 23 Jul 2024 04:18 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/3292 |
![[thumbnail of Amalia Laksmita Dewi.pdf]](http://repository.ub.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Amalia Laksmita Dewi.pdf Download (1MB) |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |