Akbar, Achmad Taufiq and Dr. Faizin Sulistio,, S.H., LL.M and Solehuddin,, S.H., M.H (2023) Ratio Decidendi Putusan Hakim Dalam Perkara Perjudian Online. Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
Putusan Nomor 563/Pid.B/2020/PN Byw, Putusan Nomor 111/Pid.B/2016/PN Pbl, Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 123/Pid.B/2020/PN Pkl, Putusan Nomor 71/Pid.B/2021/PN Gin, Putusan Nomor 346/Pid.B/2019/PN Pkl, putusan pengadilan yang diangkat penulis untuk dikaji ratio decidendi hakim dalam putusan tersebut memutuskan terdakwa dalam kelima putusan tersebut terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan melakukan perjudian online yang dimaksud dalam Pasal 303 ayat (1) Ke-2 KUHP. Ditambah dalam asas hukum pidana Indonesia telah diatur bahwa Hukum yang bersifat khusus mengesampingkan hukum yang bersifat umum atau di kenal dengan asas lex specialis derogat legi generali yang diatur dalam Pasal 63 Ayat (2) KUHP. Berdasarkan hal diatas, rumusan masalah dalam skripsi ini adalah: (1) Apakah ratio decidendi putusan hakim dalam perkara perkara perjudian online menggunakan Pasal 303 ayat (1) ke-2 KUHP sudah tepat? (2) Apakah penggunaan pasal 303 ayat (1) ke-2 KUHP dalam perkara perjudian online sudah sesuai dengan penerapan asas lex specialis derogat legi generali? Kemudian penulisan skripsi ini menggunakan metode normatif dengan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang diperoleh penulis akan dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik analisis Interpretasi Sistematis, Interpretasi Gramatikal, Analisis Deduktif. Jawaban permasalahan tersebut, A. kelima Putusan yaitu Putusan Nomor 563/Pid.B/2020/PN, Putusan Nomor 111/Pid.B/2016/PN Pbl, Putusan Nomor 123/Pid.B/2020/PN Pkl, Putusan Nomor 71/Pid.B/2021/PN Gin, Putusan Nomor 346/Pid.B/2019/PN Pkl diputus oleh hakim dalam masing-masing putusan menggunakan Pasal 303 ayat (1) Ke-2 dimana unsur-unsurnya diperinci sebagai berikut : 1. Terpenuhinya unsur barang siapa, 2. Terpenuhinya unsur tanpa mendapat ijin, 3. Terpenuhinya unsur dengan sengaja menawarkan atau memberi kesempatan kepada khalayak umum, 4. Terpenuhinya unsur untuk bermain judi atau dengan sengaja turut serta dalam perusahaan untuk itu, dengan tidak peduli apakah untuk menggunakan kesempatan adanya suatu syarat atau dipenuhinya sesuatu tata cara. B. Penggunaan Pasal 303 Ayat (1) Ke-2 KUHP yang bersifat lex generalis telah dipilih hakim tidak tepat dan tidak berkesesuaian sebagai pasal dalam perkara perjudian online togel, fakta-fakta hukum yang terungkap dalam persidangan, perbuatan masing-masing terdakwa telah memenuhi unsur-unsur dalam Pasal 27 Ayat (2) UU ITE yang bersifat lex specialis dimana telah dimuat ketentuannya dalam Pasal 63 Ayat (2) KUHP. Konsekuensi yuridis yang terjadi meskipun Penyusunan dakwaan kurang tepat dalam kelima putusan yang penulis gunakan, adalah tetap dianggap sah (inkracht van gewijsde). Karena, para pihak dalam waktu tujuh hari sesuai dengan Pasal 233 ayat (2) KUHAP tidak mengajukan banding dan selama empat belas hari sesuai Pasal 245 ayat (1) KUHAP tidak mengajukan upaya hukum kasasi. Hal ini berarti para pihak telah menerima putusan pengadilan tersebut.
English Abstract
Decision Number 563/Pid.B/2020/PN Byw, Decision Number 111/Pid.B/2016/PN Pbl, Court Decision Number 123/Pid.B/2020/PN Pkl, Decision Number 71/Pid.B/2021/ PN Gin, Decision Number 346/Pid.B/2019/PN Pkl, the court decision appointed by the author to review the judge's ratio decidendi in the decision decided that the defendant in the five decisions was legally and convincingly proven to have carried out online gambling referred to in Article 303 paragraph (1 ) 2nd Criminal Code. In addition, in the principles of Indonesian criminal law it has been regulated that laws that are specific in nature override laws that are general in nature or are known as the lex specialis derogat legi generali principle regulated in Article 63 Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code. Based on the above, the formulation of the problem in this thesis is: (1) Is the ratio decidendi of the judge's decision in online gambling cases using Article 303 paragraph (1) 2nd Criminal Code correct? (2) Is the use of Article 303 paragraph (1) 2 of the Criminal Code in online gambling cases in accordance with the application of the lex specialis derogat legi generali principle? Then the writing of this thesis uses the normative method with the statutory approach (statute approach) and case approach (case approach). Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained by the author will be analyzed using the analytical techniques of Systematic Interpretation, Grammatical Interpretation, Deductive Analysis. The answers to these problems, A. The five decisions, namely Decision Number 563/Pid.B/2020/PN, Decision Number 111/Pid.B/2016/PN Pbl, Decision Number 123/Pid.B/2020/PN Pkl, Decision Number 71 /Pid.B/2021/PN Gin, Decision Number 346/Pid.B/2019/PN Pkl was decided by a judge in each decision using Article 303 paragraph (1) 2nd where the elements are detailed as follows: 1. Whose element is fulfilled, 2. The element is fulfilled without obtaining permission, 3. The element is deliberately offered or given an opportunity to the general public, 4. The element is to play gambling or deliberately participate in a company for that purpose, regardless of whether to use the opportunity for the existence of a condition or the fulfillment of a certain procedure. B. The use of Article 303 Paragraph (1) of the 2nd Criminal Code which is lex generalis in nature has been chosen by the judge to be inappropriate and inappropriate as an article in the online lottery gambling case, the legal facts revealed in court, the actions of each defendant have fulfilled the elements-elements in Article 27 Paragraph (2) of the ITE Law which are lex specialis in which provisions have been contained in Article 63 Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code. The juridical consequences that occur even though the formulation of the indictment is inaccurate in the five decisions that the author uses, are still considered valid (inkracht van gewijsde). Because, the parties within seven days in accordance with Article 233 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code did not file an appeal and within fourteen days in accordance with Article 245 paragraph (1) did not file an appeal. This means that the parties have accepted the decision.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Sarjana) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | 052301 |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Samuri |
| Date Deposited: | 08 Jan 2024 08:26 |
| Last Modified: | 08 Jan 2024 08:26 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/206253 |
![[thumbnail of DALAM MASA EMBARGO]](http://repository.ub.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (DALAM MASA EMBARGO)
Achmad Taufiq Akbar.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 31 December 2025. Download (2MB) |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |