Nugraha, Bima Wida and Dr. Hanif Nur Widhiyanti, S.H., M.Hum. and Prawatya Ido Nurhayati, S.H., M.Kn (2022) Relevansi Tying dan Bundling Dengan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
Perkembangan zaman semakin hari semakin pesat. Hal ini membuat kebutuhan berbanding lurus dengan makin pesatnya pertumbuhan tersebut. Kebutuhan yang terus berkembang mengakibatkan banyaknya pelaku usaha membuka lini usaha baru. Oleh sebab itu persaingan usaha di antara para pelaku usaha tidak bisa dihindarkan. Persaingan usaha yang sedemikian masif mengakibatkan perlunya dibentuk suatu sistem perundang-undangan agar menjaga iklim persaingan tetap kondusif. Maka dari itu tercipta Undang-undang Nomor5Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. UU Nomor5Tahun 1999 tersebut menunjuk suatu lembaga independen yaitu KPPU sebagai lembaga yang berwenang untuk mengadili perkara-perkara persaingan usaha. Pada awal tahun 2021 KPPU memutus perkara Nomor 31/KPPU-I/2019 tentang dugaan kasus Tying dan Bundling agreement yang melibatkan PT. AHM. Dalam penelitian ini, menggunakan metode yuridis normatif yaitu dengan menganalisis ketentuan Tying dan Bundling yang terdapat dalam Undang-undang Nomor5Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, serta menganalisis penggunaan pendekatan rule of reason dalam memutus perkara Nomor 31/KPPU-I/2019.
English Abstract
The development of the times is getting faster. This causes necessity to be directly proportional to the rapid growth. The growing necessity has resulted in many business actors opening new business lines. Therefore, business competition among business actors cannot be avoided. Such massive business competition has resulted in the necessity for a legal system to be established in order to maintain a conducive competitive climate. Therefore, Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition was created. Law Number 5 of 1999 appoints an independent institution, namely KPPU as the authorized institution to adjudicate business competition cases. In early 2021 KPPU decided on case Number 31/KPPU-I/2019 regarding the alleged tying and bundling agreement case involving PT. AHM. In this study, using the normative juridical method, namely by analyzing the tying and bundling provisions contained in Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, as well as analyzing the use of the rule of reason approach in deciding the case Number 31/KPPU- I/2019. From the results of the research that has been done, it can be seen that there are differences between tying and bundling in business competition in Indonesia. It is also known that the use of the rule of reason approach in deciding tying and bundling cases conducted by KPPU can benefit business actors, consumers and the business competition climate in Indonesia.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Sarjana) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | 0521010144 |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 340 Law |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Nur Cholis |
| Date Deposited: | 24 May 2023 02:46 |
| Last Modified: | 24 May 2023 02:46 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/200168 |
![[thumbnail of DALAM MASA EMBARGO]](http://repository.ub.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (DALAM MASA EMBARGO)
BIMA WIDA NUGRAHA.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 31 December 2023. Download (2MB) |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |