Yulidar, Hendriek S and Dr. Rachmi Sulistyorini,, S.H., M.H. and Dr. M. Sudirman,, S.H., M.H., Sp.N., M.Kn., ME (2022) Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditor Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu-Xvii/2019. Magister thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 yang memberikan perbedaan terhadap eksekusi objek jaminan fidusia apabila debitor wanprestasi, perbedaan tersebut yaitu wanprestasi yang harus disepakati oleh kedua pihak, dan apabila debitor wanprestasi, debitor harus secara sukarela menyerahkan objek jaminan fidusia, serta apabila debitor wanprestasi, debitor keberatan menyerahkan objek jaminan fidusia secara sukarela, kreditor harus mengajukan gugatan ke pengadilan untuk dapat melaksanakan eksekusi objek jaminan fidusia, hal ini membuat posisi kreditor menjadi lemah dan mendapatkan kerugian, dengan melaksanakan eksekusi objek jaminan fidusia secara langsung sesuai Undang Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia, kreditor dapat segera memperoleh ganti rugi serta perlindungan hukum atas wanprestasi debitor. Berdasarkan uraian latar belakang diatas maka permаsаlаhаn yаng аkаn penulis teliti dalam penelitian ini adalah apa bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap kreditor pemegang jaminan fidusia pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019, dan bagaimana konsep pembuatan akta jaminan fidusia pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan metode pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual, serta menggunakan bahan hukum primer, sekunder, tersier yang dianalisis melalui metode penemuan hukum, metode interpretаsi sistemаtis dan metode interpretasi preskriptif. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap kreditor pemegang jaminan fidusia pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019, adalah melalui klausula dalam perjanjian antara lain dengan memuat klausula yang memperjelas mengenai bentuk wanprestasi debitor, dan mengenai penyerahan objek jaminan fidusia secara sukarela kepada kreditor apabila debitor wanprestasi, serta apabila debitor wanprestasi lalu keberatan untuk menyerahkan objek jaminan fidusia kepada kreditor, maka kreditor berhak mengambil benda yang menjadi objek jaminan fidusia, yang apabila perlu dapat meminta bantuan pengamanan dari pihak berwenang, kemudian konsep pembuatan akta jaminan fidusia berdasarkan Pasal 38 Undang Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, yaitu setiap akta terdiri dari Awal Akta atau Kepala Akta, Badan Akta, dan Akhir Akta.
English Abstract
This research is motivated by the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 which provides a difference to the execution of the object of fiduciary security if the debtor is in breach of contract, the difference is a breach of contract which must be agreed by both, and if the debtor is in breach of contract, the debtor must voluntarily submit the object of the fiduciary guarantee, and if the debtor breach of contract, the debtor objects to submitting the fiduciary guarantee voluntarily, the creditor must file a lawsuit to the court to be able carry out the execution of the object fiduciary guarantee, this is makes the creditor's position weak and incur losses, by carrying out the execution of the object fiduciary guarantee directly according to Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees, creditors can immediately obtain compensation and legal protection for debtor breach of contract. Based on the description of the background above, the problem that the author examines in this research is what form of legal protection for creditors holding fiduciary guarantees is after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, and how is the concept of making a fiduciary guarantee deed after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 /PUU-XVII/2019. This research is a normative juridical research, with a legal approach and a conceptual approach, and uses primary, secondary, tertiary legal materials which are analyzed through legal discovery methods, systematic interpretation methods and prescriptive interpretation methods. The results of this study are a form of legal protection for creditors holding fiduciary guarantees after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, is through clauses in the agreement, among others by including clauses that clarify the form debtor breach of contract, and regarding the surrender of the object of fiduciary guarantees voluntarily to the creditor if the debtor breach of contract, if the debtor breach of contract and the debtor heaviness to submitting the object fiduciary guarantee to the creditor, creditor has the right take the object fiduciary guarantee, if necessary, can request security assistance from the authorities, the concept of making a fiduciary guarantee deed based on Article 38 Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary, namely the Beginning of Deed or Head of Deed, the Deed Body, and the End of the Deed.
Other obstract
-
| Item Type: | Thesis (Magister) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | 0422010002 |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 340 Law |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Nur Cholis |
| Date Deposited: | 09 May 2023 06:46 |
| Last Modified: | 09 May 2023 06:46 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/199109 |
![[thumbnail of DALAM MASA EMBARGO]](http://repository.ub.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (DALAM MASA EMBARGO)
Hendriek S Yulidar.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 31 December 2024. Download (3MB) |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |