Purwanto, Arief and Ir. Heru Nurwarsito, M.Kom. (2020) Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Reactive Routing Protocol Dan Proactive Routing Protocol Pada Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Berdasarkan Mobility Model. Magister thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
MANET memiliki dua tipe protokol routing utama yaitu reactive routing protocol dan proactive routing protocol. Protokol routing AODV merupakan salah satu contoh reactive routing protocol. Protokol routing OLSR dan DSDV ialah bagian proactive routing protocol. Mobility model berdampak besar terhadap kinerja protokol routing karena dapat menentukan keberhasilan routing. Random Waypoint Mobility Model (RWP) dan Random Walk Mobility Model (RW) memiliki kemiripan pada pola pergerakan node yang berlangsung secara acak. Akan tetapi pada mobility model RW tidak terdapat jeda waktu. Perbedaan pada kedua mobility model ini dapat mempengaruhi kinerja protokol routing. Penelitian ini melakukan analisis kinerja reactive routing protocol dan proactive routing protocol ketika diuji berdasarkan mobility model RWP dan RW menggunakan Network Simulator 3.29. Hasil penelitian pada RWP menunjukkan kinerja protokol routing AODV unggul pada parameter uji PDR sebesar 92,94 % dan packet loss sebesar 7,06 %. Protokol routing OLSR unggul pada parameter uji throughput sebesar 6,87 Kbps. Protokol routing DSDV unggul pada parameter uji delay sebesar 29,93 ms. Sedangkan hasil penelitian pada RW menunjukkan kinerja protokol routing AODV unggul pada parameter uji PDR sebesar 92,81 %, delay sebesar 27,96 ms, dan packet loss sebesar 7,19 %. Protokol routing OLSR unggul pada parameter uji throughput sebesar 6,07 Kbps.
English Abstract
MANET has two main types of routing protocols, namely reactive routing protocols and proactive routing protocols. The AODV routing protocol is an example of a reactive routing protocol. The OLSR and DSDV routing protocols are part of the proactive routing protocol. The mobility model has a big impact on the performance of the routing protocol because it can determine the success of the routing. The Random Waypoint Mobility Model (RWP) and the Random Walk Mobility Model (RW) have similarities in the pattern of node movement that takes place randomly. However, on the mobility of the RW model, there is no time lag. The difference between these two mobility models can affect the performance of the routing protocol. This study analyzes the performance of reactive routing protocols and proactive routing protocols when tested based on the mobility of the RWP and RW models using Network Simulator 3.29. The results of the research on RWP showed that the performance of the AODV routing protocol was superior to the PDR test parameter of 92.94% and packet loss of 7.06%. OLSR routing protocol excels in the throughput test parameter of 6.87 Kbps. The DSDV routing protocol excels in the delay test parameter of 29.93 ms. While the results of research on RW showed that the performance of the AODV routing protocol was superior to the PDR test parameter of 92.81%, delay of 27.96 ms, and packet loss of 7.19%. OLSR routing protocol excels in the throughput test parameter of 6.07 Kbps.
Other obstract
-
| Item Type: | Thesis (Magister) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | 0520150062 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | MANET, AODV, OLSR, DSDV, Random Waypoint Mobility Model, Random Walk Mobility Model. |
| Subjects: | 000 Computer science, information and general works > 004 Computer science > 004.6 Interfacing and communications |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Ilmu Komputer > Teknik Informatika |
| Depositing User: | Budi Wahyono Wahyono |
| Date Deposited: | 28 Feb 2021 14:11 |
| Last Modified: | 08 Oct 2024 08:19 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/183635 |
![[thumbnail of Arief Purwanto.pdf]](http://repository.ub.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Arief Purwanto.pdf Download (3MB) |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |