Mahamidi, Azhar (2019) Urgensi Kewajiban Notaris Melekatkan Sidik Jari Penghadap Pada Minuta Akta Sebagaimana Dimaksud Dalam Pasal 16 Ayat (1) Huruf C Undang-Undang Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Magister thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
Pada penelitian Tesis ini, Penulis mengangkat permasalahan tentang Urgensi Kewajiban Notaris Melekatkan Sidik Jari Penghadap Pada Minuta Akta sebagaimana dimaksud dalam pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf c Undang-Undang tentang Jabatan Notaris. Pilihan tema tersebut dilatarbelakangi oleh adanya penambahan aturan baru yaitu dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 mengenai kewajiban notaris melekatkan sidik jari penghadap pada minuta akta, namun dalam penjelasan pasal tersebut hanya dituliskan “cukup jelas” tidak menjelaskan makna dan manfaat pada ketentuan ini. Hal tersebut menjadikan peraturan bersifat multitafsir. Berdasarkan hal tersebut diatas, karya tulis ini mengangkat rumusan masalah : (1) Apa urgensi kewajiban notaris melekatkan sidik jari penghadap pada minuta akta? (2) Apakah sidik jari mampu menambah kekuatan pembuktian minuta akta apabila salah satu pihak mengingkari tanda tangan? Kemudian penulisan karya tulis ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan historis (historical approach). Bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang diperoleh penulis melalui studi kepustakaan (library research) dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik analisis bahan hukum. Dari analisis sesuai dengan metode diatas, maka penulis memperoleh hasil penelitian dan jawaban dari rumusan masalah yang telah dikemukakan diatas, bahwa penambahan ketentuan tersebut dilakukan sebagai bentuk upaya Pemerintah dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak yang terlibat dalam pembuatan akta. Sidik jari digunakan sebagai alat bukti tambahan untuk membantah penyangkalan yang dilakukan oleh para pihak, karena selama ini apabila terjadi suatu sengketa pada suatu akta para penghadap cenderung mengingkari kehadirannya dihadapan Notaris. Adanya ketentuan pelekatan sidik jari ini yakni bersifat preventif guna mencegah sengketa yang dapat timbul atau mempersempit kemungkinan sengketa yang dapat timbul dikemudian hari pada akta tersebut.
English Abstract
In this thesis research, the author raises the issue of the obligation of a notary to attach the face fingerprint to a Minute of Deed as referred to in article 16 paragraph (1) letter c concerning the law on the position of a notary. The choice of the theme was motivated by the addition of new rules, namely in the notary number 2 of 2014 regarding the obligation of notaries to attach fingerprints to minuta deeds, but in the explanation of the article only written "clear enough" does not explain the meaning and benefits of this provision . This makes the regulation multi-interpretative. Based on the above, this paper raises the formulation of the problem: (1) What is the urgency of the notary's obligation to attach fingerprints to the minuta deed? (2) Is the fingerprint able to increase the strength of proof of the deed if one of the parties denies the signature? Then the writing of this paper uses a normative juridical method with the method of legislation approach (statute approach) and historical approach (historical approach). Primary and secondary legal materials obtained by the authors were analyzed using library research analysis techniques (library research) through reviewing legal materials, by studying and citing legal materials from available sources, namely in the form of literature studies in the Public Library and Malang City Archives, Library Brawijaya University, UB's Faculty of Law's Documentation and Legal Information Center (PDIH FHUB), legislation, and articles relating to the obligation to attach fingerprints. From the results of research and analysis in accordance with the method above, the author obtained the results of research and answers from the formulation of the problems stated above, that the addition of these provisions was carried out as a form of Government efforts to provide legal protection for the parties involved in making the deed. Fingerprints are used as additional evidence to disprove denials carried out by parties, because so far when a dispute occurs on a deed, the viewers tend to deny their presence before a Notary. The provisions of this fingerprint attachment are preventive in nature to prevent disputes that can arise or narrow down the possibility of disputes that can arise later on the deed.
Other obstract
-
| Item Type: | Thesis (Magister) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | TES/347.016/MAH/u/2019/041909555 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | NOTARIES, NOTARIES - LAW AND LEGISLATION |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 347 Procedure and courts > 347.01 Courts > 347.016 Other officials |
| Divisions: | S2/S3 > Magister Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Endang Susworini |
| Date Deposited: | 27 Dec 2019 06:40 |
| Last Modified: | 27 Dec 2019 06:40 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/177390 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |