Maharani, Tara Kirana (2019) Batasan Tanggung Jawab Mantan Direksi Perusahaan Pt. Usayana Menurut Doktrin Business Judgement Rule (Studi Putusan Nomor: 406/Pdt.G/2010/Pn.Bks.). Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
Pada penulisan skripsi ini, penulis mengangkat permasalahan dengan latar belakang kasus antara PT. Usayana yang menggugat mantan direksinya untuk bertanggungjawab secara pribadi, akibat adanya kerugian perusahaan yang dianggap sebagai akibat dari keputusan bisnis direksi tersebut. Dimana berdasarkan doktrin business judgement rule, yang menurut para ahli telah diakomodir dalam UUPT, direksi dapat terbebas dari tanggung jawab pribadi selama keputusan bisnisnya memenuhi fiduciary duty dan itikad baik. Berdasarkan latar belakang diatas penulis mengangkat rumusan masalah mengenai apa batasan tanggung jawab mantan direksi perusahaan PT. Usayana menurut doktrin business judgement rule. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan penulis dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif yang didasarkan pada studi kepustakaan, dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (Statute Approach) dan pendekatan kasus (Case Approach). Kesimpulan yang dapat diambil dari pembahasan yang disusun penulis, batasan tanggung jawab mantan direksi PT. Usayana menurut doktrin business judgment rule adalah terbatas atau dapat diartikan bahwa mantan direksi PT. Usayana terbebas dari tanggung jawab secara pribadi yang dibebankan kepadanya, sekalipun hasil dari keputusan bisnis yang telah ia laksanakan mengakibatkan kerugian pada perseroan. Direksi tidak dapat dibebankan tanggung jawab pribadi, selama tindakan dalam proses pengambilan keputusan telah memenuhi prinsip fiduciary duty, yaitu mempunyai itikad baik dan dasar–dasar yang rasional (rational basis), dilakukan dengan kehati–hatian (due care), serta dilakukan dengan cara yang layak dipercayai (reasonable belief) sebagai yang terbaik (best interest) bagi perseroan.
English Abstract
At the writing of this thesis, The background of this research is the case between PT. Usayana and its former directors. PT. Usayana sued his former director for personal responsibility, due to the loss of the company that is considered as a result of the director’s business decision. Based on the doctrine of Business judgement rule, which is according to experts have been accommodated in UUPT, the board of directors can be exempt from personal responsibility as long as the business decisions meet fiduciary duty and good faith. Based on the background above the author raises the problem about what is the scope of responsibility held by the former director of PT. Usayana according to business judgement rule doctrine. The type of research used in this study is normative juridical research based on literature study, with the Statute Approach and Case approach. Conclusions that can be taken from the discussion, the limitation of responsibilities of PT. Usayana’s former directors according to the business judgement rule doctrine is limited or it can be interpreted that the former directors of PT. Usayana are free of personal responsibility charged to them, notwithstanding the results of the business decisions he has performed resulted in a loss to the company. The directors cannot be held by personal responsibility, as long as the action in the decision-making process has fulfilled the fiduciary duty principle, namely having good faith and rationale basis, done with care, and is done in a manner that is worthy of the best interest for the company.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Sarjana) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | SKR/FH/2019/252/051909467 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | - |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 346 Private law > 346.06 Organizations (Associations) > 346.066 Corporations (Companies) > 346.066 4 Management > 346.066 42 Officers |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Endang Susworini |
| Date Deposited: | 20 Jul 2020 03:28 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2020 02:38 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/174858 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |