Khasanah, Umrotul (2013) Analisis Praktik-Praktik Sistem Profit and Loss Sharing (PLS) pada Masyarakat Petani Padi di Malang Raya. Doctor thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami: (a) praktik profit and loss sharing (PLS) di kalangan masyarakat petani padi yaitu aktor-aktor yang terlibat, model pembiayaan pengelolaan lahan dan model-model sistem PLS: pertelonan, paroan, dan bawonan . (b) Makna penggunaan PLS dalam masyarakat petani padi itu sendiri. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitain deskriptif kualitatif studi kasus dengan pendekatan strukturasi Giddens. Penelitian ini mementingkan makna, konteks, dan perspektif emik. Analisis data menggunakan pendekatan Creswell (1994):menganalisa pernyataan penting, merumuskan, mendeskripsikan, mereduksi data menuju temuan, proposisi dan kesimpulan. Pengumpulan dan analisis data dilakukan secara simultan; memprioritaskan observasi dan wawancara dan peneliti sendiri sebagai instrumen utamanya. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan: (1) Praktik PLS menemukan tiga poin, yaitu (a) Ada 13 aktor yang terlibat dalam proses budidaya tanaman padi, empat aktor terlibat langsung sistem PLS atau disebut shareholders dan sembilan aktor yang terlibat secara tidak langsung atau disebut stakeholders , (b) Terdapat empat model pembiayaan pengelolaan lahan, yaitu Model LS (Lahan Sewa), Model PP-M-D (Petani Penggarap-berpartner dengan tukang Majek- dan tukang Derep), Model PP-MS-D (Petani Penggarap-Majek Sendiri-berpartner dengan tukang Derep) dan Model PL-SBH-PP (Pemilik Lahan-Sistem Bagi Hasil-Petani Penggarap), (c) Tiga sistem PLS dengan formula: bawonan 12:3:1, pertelonan 2:1, dan paroan 1:1. (2) Terdapat lima makna PLS bagi petani padi, yaitu (a) Makna keadilan ekonomi, (b) Makna kesejahteraan, (c) Makna perekonomian bergotongroyong, (d) Makna barokah, dan (e) Makna sebagai sumber etika.
English Abstract
The study aims to understand: (a) The practice of profit and Loss Sharing (PLS) among the rice farmers, i.e. parties involved, the model of land maintenance cost and PLS system model: pertelonan (one third), paroan (half) and bawonan (fee system); (b) The meaning of the use of PLS among the rice farmers themselves. The study uses descriptive qualitative method, a case study using the Giddens structural approach. This study puts heavy emphasis on meaning, contexs and emic perspectives. The data analysis is based on Cresswell (1994): analyzing important statement, formulating, describing, reducing data to lead to findings, proposition and conclusion. The data collection and data analysis are conducted simultaneously; prioritizing observation and interview and the researcher herself as the main research instrument. The findings of the study shows: (1) The practice of PLS consists of three points, namely (a) There are 13 parties involved in the process of rice cultivation, the four parties directly involved of PLS system called shareholders and nine parties indirectly involved called stakeholders, ( b) There are four cost models of land maintenance, namely, LL (Land Lease), CF-M-D (Cultivator Farmers – partnered with Majek handyman – Derep handyman), CF-SM-D (Cultivator Farmers – Self Majek – partnered with Derep handyman) and LL-PLS-CF(Land Lord – Profit and Loss Sharing System – Cultivator Farmers), (c) There are three of PLS system with a ratio: bawonan 12:3:1, pertelonan 2:1, and paroan 1:1; (2) There are five meanings of PLS for rice farmers, namely (a) economic justice meaning, (b) welfare meaning, (c) mutual aid meaning, (d) blessed meaning and (e) as an ethic resource meaning.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctor) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | DES/332.216 47/KHA/a/061404018 |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 332 Financial economics > 332.2 Specialized banking institutions |
| Divisions: | S2/S3 > Doktor Kimia, Fakultas MIPA |
| Depositing User: | Endro Setyobudi |
| Date Deposited: | 06 Aug 2014 10:47 |
| Last Modified: | 06 Aug 2014 10:47 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/160735 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |