Ahsan, Mohammad (2015) Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Jurusan Di SMA Berdasarkan Multiple Intelligence Menggunakan Teknik Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM). Magister thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
Kecerdasan anak (siswa) dapat diperlihatkan lewat banyak cara baik itu melalui kata-kata, angka, musik, gambar, kegiatan fisik (kemampuan motorik) atau lewat cara sosial-emosional. SMA memiliki jurusan IPA, IPS dan Bahasa. Pemilihan jurusan bagi siswa adalah komplek karena melibatkan banyak faktor seperti kemampuan, minat dan bakat. Dalam kenyataannya penjurusan sering didasarkan pada nilai raport SMP/Mts dan nilai ujian nasional untuk bidang matematika, pengetahuan sosial dan bahasa. Menginat kesulitan para siswa dalam menentukan jurusan maka diperlukan bantuan sistem pendukung keputusan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk membuat sistem pendukung keputusan dan mengetahui performa metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (SPK) yang diintegrasikan dengan tes multiple intelligence. Penambahan tes multiple intelligence pada metode SAW digunakan untuk menentukan kecerdasan yang dimiliki oleh siswa. Penelitian dilakukan dengan 13 kriteria yaitu Nilai Ujian Nasional, Minat atau pilihan siswa, Pilihan orang tua, Alasan memilih peminatan, Matapelajaran yang disenangi, Skore IQ, Saran dari Psikolog dan Nilai Tes Multiple Intelligence untuk menentukan 3 alternatif jurusan meliputi IPA, IPS dan Bahasa. Dalam sistem pendukung keputusan jurusan terdapat nilai yang berupa nilai objektif dan subjektif. Nilai kriteria objektif berdasarkan nilai akademik dan kriteria subjektif berdasarkan nilai pembobot. Analisis penelitian meliputi: perbandingan hasil perhitungan manual dengan SPK berdasarkan teknik Multiple-Attribute Decesion Making (MADM), membandingkan performa metode SAW dengan metode AHP dalam hal kecepatan eksekusi proses rekomendasi dan ketepatan hasil akhir sistem dengan rekomendasi lembaga dan psikolog berdasarkan minat siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa metode SAW memiliki ketepatan 83% sesuai dengan pilihan siswa, sedangkan metode AHP memiliki ketepatan 25% sesuai dengan pilihan siswa. Selain itu, metode SAW memiliki tingkat kesesuaian dengan saran psikolog 46% lebih rendah daripada metode AHP yang memiliki kesesuaian 67% dalam hal ketepatan hasil sistem dengan rekomendasi penjurusan seorang psikolog.
English Abstract
intelligence of children (students) can be shown many ways, it is by words, numbers, music, pictures, physical activity (skills) or social-emotional way. SMA has direction in science, social and language. Selection of direction for students is complex as it involves many factors such as ability, interests and talents. Fact of direction often based on value of report cards SMP/MTs and national test scores in ma matics, social sciences and languages. Given difficulties of students in determining direction, we need help of a decision support system. purpose of this research is create a decision support system and determine performance of method Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) on Decision Support System (DSS) that is integrated with multiple intelligence tests. multiple intelligence test at SAW method used to determine intelligence possessed by students. study was conducted with thirteen criteria that is national examination value, interest or students choice, parental choice, reason for choosing specialization, favored lesson, a score intelligence quotient, advice from psychologists and multiple intelligence test scores to determine three direction alternative science, social studies and english. In Departments decision support system re is value in form of objective and subjective values. value of objective criteria based on academic values and subjective criteria based on weighting values. Analysis of research include: comparison of results of manual calculations with DSS based techniques Multiple-Attribute decesion Making (MADM), comparing performance of SAW method with AHP method in terms of execution speed and accuracy of final result on recommendation system based on interest of institution and student psychologist. results showed that SAW method has an accuracy of 83% in accordance with students choice, while AHP method has an accuracy of 25% according to students choice. In addition, SAW method has a level of conformity with advice psychologists 46% lower viii than AHP who meets 67% in terms of accuracy of system with recommendations of a psychologist majors.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Magister) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | TES/658.403/AHS/s/041500470 |
| Subjects: | 600 Technology (Applied sciences) > 658 General management > 658.4 Executive management |
| Divisions: | S2/S3 > Magister Teknik Elektro, Fakultas Teknik |
| Depositing User: | Samsul Arifin |
| Date Deposited: | 25 Mar 2015 15:37 |
| Last Modified: | 25 Mar 2015 15:37 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/159658 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |