Handoko, William Surya Putra (2018) Analisis Yuridis Putusan Hakim Mengenai Penolakan Gugatan Wanprestasi Oleh Anggota Koperasi Terhadap Koperasi ( Studi Kasus Putusan Perkara Nomor : 83/Pdt.G/2016/Pn.Mlg. ). Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
Dalam prakteknya, Koperasi dapat melakukan beberapa jenis pengelolaan dan penyaluran dana misalnya saja kegiatan usaha simpan pinjam. Dengan adanya perjanjian akan timbul hak dan kewajiban bagi para pihaknya disertai juga perikatan, yaitu suatu hubungan hukum yang menimbulkan akibat hukum atau Undang-Undang. Namun perjanjian terkadang tidak berjalan sesuai dengan apa yang telah diperjanjikan antara debitur dan kreditur atau biasa kita sebut dengan Wanprestasi. Menurut Undang-Undang Perkoperasian, apabila terjadi kerugian yang dilakukan Koperasi, maka pengurus secara bersama-sama akan menanggung kerugian tersebut. Pada putusan perkara Nomor : 83/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Mlg. antara Ibu Linda selaku Penggugat melawan Koperasi “Sri Rejeki” Unit Simpan Pinjam selaku Tergugat telah terjadi Wanprestasi yang telah dilakukan oleh Tergugat. Namun pada putusannya, Hakim mengabulkan eksepsi Tergugat dan menyatakan gugatan Penggugat kabur (Obscuur Libel) dan kurang pihak (Plurium Iitis Consortium). Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut di atas, maka permasalahan hukum yang dikemukakan dalam penelitian adalah dasar pertimbangan dalam putusan perkara Nomor : 83/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Mlg. telah sesuai dengan prinsip tanggung jawab pengurus Koperasi sebagaimana diatur pada Pasal 31, 32 dan 34 Undang-Undang Perkoperasian dan akibat hukum dari putusan perkara Nomor : 83/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Mlg. bagi Penggugat selaku Anggota Koperasi. Untuk menjawab permasalahan di atas, penelitian hukum normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus dan pendekatan analisis. Bahan-bahan hukum yang berhubungan dengan masalah yang diteliti diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan, kemudian bahan-bahan hukum tersebut akan dianalisi menggunakan teknik deskriptif dan interpretasi. Berdasarkan pembahasan, maka dapat disimpulkan : 1. Dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam Putusan Perkara Nomor : 83/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Mlg. mengenai adalah pertimbangan yang menyimpangi Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 1992 tentang Perkoperasian; 2. Akibat hukum dari Putusan Perkara Nomor : 83/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Mlg. bagi Penggugat selaku Anggota Koperasi adalah Penggugat berhak memperoleh ganti kerugian yang telah diderita oleh Penggugat berupa simpanan pokok deposito, bunga, kerugian materiil dan immateriil yang belum diserahkan kepada Penggugat.
English Abstract
In practice, the Cooperative can perform several types of management and channeling of funds such as savings and loan business activities. With the agreement there will arise rights and obligations for the parties together with the engagement, which is a legal relationship that gives rise to legal or law effect. But the agreement sometimes does not go according to what has been agreed between the debtor and the creditor or we usually call with Wanprestasi. According to the Cooperative Act, if there is a loss made by the Cooperative, then the board together will bear the loss. On case verdict Number: 83 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PN.Mlg. between Ms. Linda as the Plaintiff against the Cooperative "Sri Rejeki" Savings and Loan Unit as Defendant has happened Default has been done by the Defendant. However, in its verdict, the Judge granted the Defendant's exception and claimed the Plaintiff's lawsuit to fade (Obscuur Libel) and the less parties (Plurium Iitis Consortium). Based on the above-mentioned background, the legal issues presented in the study are the basic considerations in the decision of the case Number: 83 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PN.Mlg. has been in accordance with the principle of cooperative management responsibility as stipulated in Articles 31, 32 and 34 of the Cooperative Act and the legal consequences of the decision of the case Number 83 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PN.Mlg. for the Plaintiff as a Cooperative Member. To address the above issues, this normative legal research uses a statutory approach, a case approach and an analytical approach. Legal materials related to the problem studied were obtained through literature study, then the legal materials will be analyzed using descriptive and interpretative techniques. Based on the discussion, it can be concluded: 1. Basic consideration of judges in Case Decision Number: 83 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PN.Mlg. concerning is a consideration deviating from Law Number 25 of 1992 concerning Cooperatives; 2. The legal consequences of Decision Case Number: 83 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PN.Mlg . for the Plaintiff as a Cooperative Member is the Plaintiff is entitled to obtain compensation suffered by the Plaintiff in the form of deposits of principal deposits, interest, material and immaterial losses not yet submitted to the Plaintiff.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Sarjana) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | SKR/FH/2018/214/051804269 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | - |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 346 Private law > 346.08 Banks and insurance > 346.082 Banks > 346.082 3 Specific topics of banks (Credit and loan institutions) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | soegeng sugeng |
| Date Deposited: | 06 Jun 2018 03:45 |
| Last Modified: | 23 Oct 2021 04:37 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/11467 |
Preview |
Text
BAB II.pdf Download (301kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
BAB I.pdf Download (376kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
BAB V.pdf Download (220kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
BAGIAN DEPAN.pdf Download (420kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
BAB IV.pdf Download (459kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
BAB III.pdf Download (336kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
DAFTAR PUSTKA.pdf Download (239kB) | Preview |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |