Harieti, Zelanio Olimpica (2016) Dasar Hukum Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Notaris Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 185 PK/Pid/2010 Terkait Tindak Pidana Memalsukan Surat. Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
Penulisan skripsi ini membahas tentang Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI, Putusan Mahkamah Agung No 185 PK/Pid/2010, Notaris tersebut dijatuhi hukuman berdasarkan Pasal 263 ayat (1) KUHP jo Pasal 55 ayat (1) ke-1 KUHP, dimana notaris H. Hamdani Abdul Kodir menurut MA melakukan tindak pidana membuat surat palsu, dalam putusan tersebut berpendapat bahwa H. Hamdani telah sadar berkehendak bersama-sama Ny. Dominika Sulihanti untuk memalsukan surat keterangan waris sebagaimana termaktub dalam Pasal 263 ayat 1 jo Pasal 55 ayat 1 dan KUHPidana, Berdasarkan konstruksi Hukum Kenotariatan, salah satu tugas jabatan Notaris yaitu “memformulasikan keinginan/tindakan para penghadap/para penghadap ke dalam bentuk akta otentik, dengan memperhatikan aturan hukum yang berlaku. Penelitian ini menggunakan yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan Perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian Dasar hukum penetapan notaris terdakwa berdasarkan putusan MA No 185 PK/Pid/2010 sebagaimana dimaksud bersalah melanggar Pasal 263 ayat 1 jo Pasal 55 ayat 1 KUHP, dalam putusan tersebut berpendapat bahwa H. Hamdani telah sadar berkehendak bersama-sama Ny. Dominika Sulihanti untuk memalsukan surat keterangan waris sebagaimana termaktub dalam Pasal 263 ayat 1 jo Pasal 55 ayat 1 dan KUHPidana dan perlindungan hukum bagi notaris adalah pasal 66 UUJN, Hak ingkar notaris dan yurisprudensi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor. 702K/SIP/1973.
English Abstract
This thesis discusses the verdict of the Supreme Court, Supreme Court Decision No. 185 PK/Pid/2010, the Notary was sentenced under Article 263 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code, where the notary H. Hamdani Abdul Kodir according to the Supreme Court with a criminal offense to make a false letter, the decision is found in H. Hamdani has consciously willed together Ny. Dominican Sulihanti to falsify the heir statement as set forth in Article 263 paragraph 1 in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 and the Criminal Code, Under Construction Law Notary, one of the duties of office of Notary namely "formulate desire/actions of the penghadap/the penghadap in the form of an authentic deed, with pay attention to the applicable law This study uses normative juridical approach to legislation and case approach Based on the legal basis of the research results of the determination of the notary accused by the Supreme Court decision No. 185 PK/Pid/2010 referred guilty of violating Article 263 paragraph 1 in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code, the decision is found in H. Hamdani has consciously willed together Ny. Dominican Sulihanti to falsify the heir statement as set forth in Article 263 paragraph 1 in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 and the Criminal Code and the legal protection of the notary is Article 66 UUJN, broken notary Rights and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court Decision Number. 702K/SIP/1973.
Other obstract
-
| Item Type: | Thesis (Sarjana) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | SKR/FH/2016/409/051703415 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Crime of the notary, letter falsify |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 347 Procedure and courts > 347.01 Courts > 347.016 Other officials |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Kustati |
| Date Deposited: | 28 Apr 2017 15:22 |
| Last Modified: | 29 Dec 2021 06:36 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/112825 |
Preview |
Text
SKRIPSI_ZELANIO OLIMPICA HARIETI.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |