Putra, Moh Wahyudi (2018) Analisis Perbandingan Performansi Kontroler Floodlight, Maestro, RYU, POX Dan ONOS Dalam Arsitektur Software Defined Network (SDN). Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
Infrastruktur jaringan utama yang hampir seluruhnya dikelola oleh vendor menyebabkan semakin kompleksnya jaringan yang dibangun, sehingga dibutuhkan pendekatan untuk mengelola dan mengimplementasikan jaringan agar mendukung kebutuhan yang beragam, yaitu dengan menggunakan Software Defined Network (SDN). Software Defined Network (SDN) memiliki konsep dasar memisahkan control plane dan data plane, sehingga jaringan dapat diprogram secara individu dari data center. Adanya kontroler berbasis protokol Openflow tersebut, software bisa dijalankan di jenis hardware yang berbeda dan tidak terikat pada perangkat yang dimiliki salah satu vendor. Beberapa kontroler yang ada diantaranya adalah Maestro, Floodlight, RYU, POX dan ONOS. Untuk mengetahui kontroler manakah yang mempunyai performa terbaik, maka dilakukan analisis perbandingan performansi diantara kontroler-kontroler tersebut. Pengujian yang dilakukan pada penelitian ini menggunakan Mininet sebagai emulator untuk merancang topologi pengujian dan Cbench digunakan untuk mengevaluasi parameter throughput dan latency. Berdasarkan pengujian yang telah dilakukan, diperoleh hasil performasi kontroler pada jumlah switch dan host bervariasi Maestro memberikan nilai throughput terbesar pada 20 switch dan 400 host yaitu 41632 flow/s, sedangkan Floodlight 484 flow/s, RYU 1175 flow/s, POX 5851 flow/s, dan ONOS 216 flow/s. Pada nilai latency Maestro memberikan nilai terbesar pada 120 switch dan 12800 host yaitu 6724 respon/s, sedangkan Floodlight 1992 respon/s, RYU 1120 respon/s, POX 3868 respon/s, dan ONOS 221 respon/s. Pada pengujian dengan jumlah switch bervariasi Maestro memberikan nilai throughput terbesar pada 120 switch dan 12800 host yaitu 15176 flow/s, sedangkan Floodlight 118 flow/s, RYU 1607 flow/s, POX 173 flow/s, dan ONOS 23 flow/s. Pada nilai latency POX memberikan nilai terbesar pada 120 switch dan 12800 host yaitu 3775 respon/s, sedangkan Floodlight 301 respon/s, Maestro 3023 respon/s, RYU 1048 respon/s, dan ONOS 69 respon/s.
English Abstract
The main network infrastructure that is almost entirely managed by vendor leads to the increasing complexity of network built, so it is needed an approach to manage and implement the network to support the diverse needs, that is the needs of using Software Defined Network (SDN). Software Defined Network (SDN) has a basic concept of separating the control plane and data plane, so the network can be programmed individually from the data center. The existence of the Openflow protocol-based controller, software can run on the different types of hardware and it’s not tied on the device which is owned by one of the vendors. Some of the existing controllers are Maestro, Floodlight, RYU, POX and ONOS. To know which controller has the best performance, then doing a performance comparison analysis among the controllers. Tests conducted in this research is using mininet as an emulator to design test topology and Cbench to evaluate parameters of throughput and latency. Based on the tests that have been done, obtained controllers performance results on the number of switch and variation host of Maestro provides the largest throughput on 20 switches and 400 hosts that is 41632 flow/s, while Floodlight484 flow/s, RYU 1175 flow/s, POX 5851 flow/s, dan ONOS 216 flow/s. At Maestro latency value gives the largest value on 120 switches and 12800 hosts that is 6724 response/s, while Floodlight 1992 response/s, RYU 1120 response/s, POX 3868 response/s, and ONOS 221 response/s. In the tests with varying number of switches, Maestro provides the largest throughput value on 120 switches and 12800 hosts that is 15176 flow/s, while Floodlight 118 flow/s, RYU 1607 flow/s, POX 173 flow/s, and ONOS 23 flow/s. On the Latency value, POX gives the largest value on 120 switches and 12800 hosts that is 3775 response/s, while Floodlight 301 response/s, Maestro 3023 response/s, RYU 1048 response/s, and ONOS 69 response/s.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Sarjana) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | SKR/FTIK/2018/202/051801224 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Software Defined Network, Maestro, Floodlight, RYU, POX, ONOS |
| Subjects: | 000 Computer science, information and general works > 004 Computer science > 004.6 Interfacing and communications > 004.65 Communications network architecture |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Ilmu Komputer > Teknik Informatika |
| Depositing User: | Yusuf Dwi N. |
| Date Deposited: | 28 May 2018 04:08 |
| Last Modified: | 27 Oct 2021 03:52 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/11182 |
Preview |
Text
BAB VI.pdf Download (689kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
BAB VII.pdf Download (457kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
Daftar Pustaka.pdf Download (473kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
BAB I.pdf Download (492kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
Bagian Depan.pdf Download (640kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
BAB II.pdf Download (875kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
BAB III.pdf Download (489kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
BAB IV.pdf Download (473kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
BAB V.pdf Download (764kB) | Preview |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |