Sabaria Eka, Nurliana and Dr. Faizin Sulistio,, S.H., LL.M and Fines Fatimah,, S.H., M.H. (2023) ISPARITAS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN SANKSI PIDANA TERKAIT TINDAK PIDANA PERJUDIAN TOTO GELAP. Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
ada skripsi ini, penulis mengangkat permasalahan Disparitas Putusan Hakim dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Terkait Tindak Pidana Toto Gelap. Pilihan tema tersebut dilatarbelakangi oleh adanya putusan No.179/Pid.B/2019/PN Mlg, putusan No.268/Pid.B/2016/PN.Sda., putusan No.51/Pid.B/2019/PN.Kdr, putusan No.186/Pid.B/2019/PN Lmj, putusan No.235/Pid.B/2018/PN Lmj, putusan No.420/Pid.B/2013/PN.Mlg., putusan No.75/Pid/B/2013/PN.SDA, putusan No.217/Pid.B/2013/PN.Sda., putusan No.539/Pid.B/2017/PN Sda, dan putusan No.722/Pid.B/2014/PN. Sda yang dalam penjatuhan pemidanaan oleh hakim memiliki perbedaan, padahal kejahatan dan kasus yang didakwakan jaksa penuntut umum sama. Disparitas pidana dalam putusan hakim terkait perjudian toto gelap menyebabkan pelaku dapat dihukum dengan sanksi yang berbedabeda, serta menyebabkan kurangnya kepastian hukum bagi masyarakat. Berdasarkan hal tersebut di atas, karya tulis ini mengangkat rumusan masalah : (1) Apakah yang menjadi pertimbangan hakim dalam penjatuhan putusan sehingga terjadi disparitas pada beberapa putusan tersebut? (2) Bagaimana aternatif pedoman rentang penjatuhan pidana yang dapat mengurangi ketidakpastian hukum dalam disparitas putusan hakim terkait perjudian jenis toto gelap? Kemudian penulisan karya tulis ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), kasus (case approach), dan konseptual (conceptual approach). Bahan hukum yang diperoleh akan dianalisis menggunakan teknik interpretasi sistematis yang mana digunakan dalam memilah bahan hukum dan menghubungkan peraturan hukum yang satu dengan keseluruhan sistem hukum berdasarkan studi putusan. Dari hasil penelitian dengan metode di atas, penulis memperoleh jawaban atas permasalahan yang ada bahwa pada beberapa putusan, disparitas putusan hakim secara umum dipengaruhi oleh undang-undang kekuasaan kehakiman, dan dipengaruhi pula oleh hal-hal yang memberatkan serta yang meringankan terdakwa. Beberapa putusan, hakim memiliki persamaan dan perbedaan pertimbangan dalam setiap putusannya, persamaan tersebut yang pertama putusan tersebut terdakwa sama-sama didakwa dan dikenakan pidana berdasarkan Pasal 303 ayat (1) ke-2 KUHP, kedua yaitu terdakwa sama-sama berperan sebagai pengecer, selanjutnya terdakwa melakukan perjudian toto gelap ini secara terbuka dan menawarkannya kepada khalayak umum, persamaan lainnya terdakwa mengetahui dan hal dilakukan terdakwa itu illegal. Perbedaannya yaitu, pertama lama penjatuhan sanksi pemidaan yang berbeda, kedua ada terdakwa yang pernah dipidana sebelumnya dengan kasus yang sama, ketiga yaitu nilai transaksi penjualan kupon perjudian toto gelap, selanjutnya lamanya terdakwa dalam menjalankan profesi pengecer. Perbedaan yang lain yaitu cara terdakwa melakukan transaksi secara langsung atau handphone. Konsep pedoman pemidanaan yang dapat mengurangi ketidakpastian hukum dalam disparitas putusan hakim terkait perjudian jenis toto gelap dengan membuat model matriks rentang pedoman pemidanaan yang dapat digunakan oleh hakim dalam penjatuhan pidana terhadap terdakwa perjudian toto gelap yang diukur berdasarkan range nilai transaksi penjualan kupon perjudian toto gelap yang diperoleh oleh pelaku.
English Abstract
In writing this research, the author raises the issue of Disparity in Judges' Decisions in Imposing Criminal Sanctions Related to the Crime of Dark Toto. The choice of theme was motivated by the decision No.179/Pid.B/2019/PN Mlg, decision No.268/Pid.B/2016/PN.Sda., decision No.51/Pid.B/2019/PN.Kdr, decision No.186/Pid.B/2019/PN Lmj, decision No.235/Pid.B/2018/PN Lmj, decision No.420/Pid.B/2013/PN.Mlg., decision No.75/Pid/B/2013/PN.SDA, decision No.217/Pid.B/2013/PN.Sda., decision No.539/Pid.B/2017/PN Sda, and decision No.722/Pid.B/2014/PN.Sda which in sentencing by judges has differences, even though the crimes and cases prosecuted by the public prosecutor are the same. Criminal disparities in judges' rulings regarding illegal gambling cases result in perpetrators being sentenced to different sanctions and lead to a lack of legal certainty for the public. Based on the above, this written work formulates the research problem: (1) What considerations do judges take into account in delivering verdicts that result in disparities in some of these rulings? (2) What are the alternative guidelines for the range of criminal sentences that can reduce legal uncertainty in the disparity in judges' decisions regarding illegal lottery gambling? The writing of this paper employs a juridical-normative method, utilizing the statute approach, case approach, and conceptual approach. Legal materials obtained will be analyzed using systematic interpretation techniques, which involve sorting legal materials and connecting individual legal regulations to the entire legal system based on the study of judicial decisions. From the results of the research using the above-mentioned methods, the author obtained answers to the existing issue that in some verdicts, the general disparity of judges' decisions is influenced by the Judicial Power Law Number 48 of 2009 regarding Judicial Power, and is also influenced by aggravating and mitigating factors for the defendant. Several decisions, judges have similarities and differences in considerations in each decision, the first similarity is that the first decision is that the defendants were both charged and subject to punishment based on Article 303 paragraph (1) 2nd KUHP, secondly, the defendants both play the role of retailers, then the defendant carried out this dark toto gambling openly and offered it to the general public, another similarity the defendant knew and what the defendant was doing was illegal. The difference is, firstly, the length of imposition of criminal sanctions is different, secondly, there are defendants who have been previously convicted in the same case, thirdly, the transaction value of the sale of toto gelap gambling coupons, then the length of time the defendant has been in the pengecer profession. Another difference is the way the defendant conducts transactions directly or via cellphone. The concept of sentencing guidelines that can reduce legal uncertainty in the disparity of judge decisions related to toto gelap gambling by creating a matrix model of the range of sentencing guidelines that can be used by judges in sentencing criminals against toto gelap gambling defendants as measured based on the range of transaction values obtained from selling dark toto gambling coupons by the perpetrator.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Sarjana) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | 052301 |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with username verry |
| Date Deposited: | 19 Jan 2024 08:33 |
| Last Modified: | 19 Jan 2024 08:33 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/212631 |
![[thumbnail of Dalam Masa Embargo]](http://repository.ub.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (Dalam Masa Embargo)
Sabaria Eka Nurliana.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 31 December 2025. Download (2MB) |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |