Geraldo, Gilbert Timothy and Dr. Bambang Sugiri,, S.H., M.H. and Alfons Zakaria,, S.H., LL.M. (2021) Disparitas Putusan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Korporasi Dumping Limbah Ke Media Lingkungan Hidup Tanpa Izin (Studi Putusan No. 1292/Pid.B/Lh/2019/Pn.Bdg. Dan Putusan No. 81/Pid.B/Lh/2020/Pn.Bdg.). Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
Pada skripsi ini, penulis mengangkat permasalahan disparitas putusan tindak pidana dumping limbah ke media lingkungan hidup tanpa izin oleh korporasi antara Putusan No. 1292/Pid.B/LH/2019/PN.Bdg. dan Putusan No. 81/Pid.B/LH /2020/PN.Bdg. Latar belakang dari penelitian ini adalah terdapat disparitas pidana dalam kedua putusan tersebut, yang mana PT. MULTI KARYA PERKASA dijatuhi pidana denda sebesar Rp. 90.000.000 dengan pidana tambahan berupa clean up limbah sludge, fly ash dan bottom ash. Sedangkan PT. MAKMUR REKA SANTIKA hanya dijatuhi pidana denda sebesar Rp. 75.000.000 dengan pidana tambahan berupa clean up limbah sludge. Berdasarkan permasalahan diatas, dapat diperoleh rumusan masalah, yaitu: (1) Apa yang menjadi dasar pertimbangan hakim (Ratio Decidendi) pada Putusan No. 1292/Pid.B/LH/2019/PN.Bdg dan Putusan No. 81/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Bdg dalam menjatuhkan sanksi pidana terhadap korporasi dumping limbah ke media lingkungan hidup tanpa izin? dan (2) Apa penyebab terjadinya disparitas pada Putusan No. 1292/Pid.B/LH/2019/PN.Bdg dan Putusan No. 81/Pid.B/LH/ 2020/PN.Bdg? Dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif dengan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, peneliti menganalisis jenis data primer, sekunder, dan tersier menggunakan teknik analisis deskriptif kualitatif dengan diinterpretasikan dengan metode gramatikal dan sistematis. Hasil dari penelitian ini, telah diperoleh jawaban atas permasalahan yang ada, yaitu: (1) Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim pada Putusan Nomor 1292/Pid.B/LH/2019/PN.Bdg: a. Terbuktinya Unsur Setiap Orang; b. Terbuktinya Unsur Yang Dimaksud Dumping Limbah Atau Bahan Ke Media Lingkungan Hidup Tanpa Izin Sebagaimana Dimaksud Dalam Pasal 60; dan c. Terbuktinya Unsur Dilakukan Oleh, Untuk, Dan Atas Nama Badan Usaha. Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim pada Putusan Nomor 81/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Bdg: a. Terbuktinya Unsur Setiap Orang; b. Terbuktinya Unsur Dilarang Melakukan Dumping Limbah dan Bahan ke Media Lingkungan Hidup Tanpa Izin; dan c. Terbuktinya Unsur Dilakukan Oleh, Untuk, Dan Atas Nama Badan Usaha. (2) Penyebab terjadinya disparitas putusan hakim pada Putusan Nomor 1292/Pid.B/LH/2019/PN.Bdg dan Putusan Nomor 81/Pid.B/LH/2020/ PN.Bdg: a. Sistem Hukum Indonesia Tidak Mengenal Yurisprudensi; b. Tidak Adanya Pedoman Pemidanaan; c. Perbedaan Jumlah Limbah B3 Yang Dibuang; dan d. Perbedaan Cara Pengelolaan Limbah B3 Oleh Masing-Masing Korporasi
English Abstract
In this thesis, the writer raises the problem of disparities in the decision of the criminal act of dumping waste into environmental media without permission by corporations between Decision No. 1292/Pid.B/LH/2019/PN.Bdg. and Decision No. 81/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Bdg. The background of this research is that there are criminal disparities in the two decisions, in which PT. MULTI KARYA PERKASA was sentenced to a fine of Rp. 90,000,000 with additional penalties in the form of clean up of sludge, fly ash and bottom ash waste. Meanwhile, PT. MAKMUR REKA SANTIKA was only sentenced to a fine of Rp. 75,000,000 with an additional penalty in the form of clean up of sludge waste. The research problems formulated in this study is: (1) What is the basis for the judge's consideration (Ratio Decidendi) in Decision No. 1292/Pid.B/LH/2019/ PN.Bdg and Decision No. 81/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Bdg in imposing criminal sanctions on corporations dumping waste into environmental media without permission? and (2) What is the cause of the disparity in Decision No. 1292/Pid.B/LH/2019/PN.Bdg and Decision No. 81/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Bdg? In this study using the juridical-normative method with the statutory approach method and the case approach, the researcher analyzed the types of primary, secondary and tertiary data using qualitative descriptive analysis techniques interpreted by grammatical and systematic methods. The results of this study have obtained answers to the existing problems, namely: (1) The Judges' Basis for Judgment in Decision No. 1292/Pid.B/LH/2019/PN.Bdg: a. Evidence of the Elements of Everyone; b. Evidence of the elements referred to as dumping waste or materials into environmental media without permission as meant in Article 60; and c. Evidence of the elements carried out by, for, and on behalf of the business entity. Basic Consideration of Judges in Decision No. 81/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Bdg: a. Evidence of the Elements of Everyone; b. It is proven that elements are prohibited from dumping waste and materials into environmental media without permission; and c. Evidence of the elements carried out by, for, and on behalf of the business entity. (2) The causes of disparities in the judges' decisions in Decision No. 1292/Pid.B/LH/2019/PN.Bdg and Decision No. 81/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Bdg: a. The Indonesian Legal System Does Not Used Jurisprudence; b. No Criminal Guidelines; c. The difference in the amount of hazardous waste disposed; and d. Different ways of managing hazardous waste by each corporation.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Sarjana) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | 052301 |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Pitoyo Widhi Atmoko |
| Date Deposited: | 17 Jan 2024 01:23 |
| Last Modified: | 17 Jan 2024 01:23 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/209882 |
![[thumbnail of DALAM MASA EMBARGO]](http://repository.ub.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (DALAM MASA EMBARGO)
209882 Gilbert Timothy Geraldo.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 31 December 2025. Download (1MB) |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |