Analisis Perencanaan Sistem Pengendalian Kualitas Pada Produksi Mesin Suspeed Berdasarkan Metode Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (Studi Kasus : PT Brawijaya Smart Industri)

Nurdiansyah, Muhammad Putra and Dr.Eng. Ir. Oke Oktavianty,, S.Si, MT and Ir. Oyong Novareza,, ST., MT., Ph.D (2023) Analisis Perencanaan Sistem Pengendalian Kualitas Pada Produksi Mesin Suspeed Berdasarkan Metode Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (Studi Kasus : PT Brawijaya Smart Industri). Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.

Abstract

PT Brawijaya Smart Industri merupakan perusahaan yang berfokus pada industri pembuatan peralatan dan mesin pengolahan pascapanen. Saat ini perusahaan sedang melakukan inovasi dan pengembangan dalam menciptakan produk yang berkualitas bagi para pelaku industri food processing. Pada penelitian ini berfokus pada Mesin Suspeed dimana mesin tersebut sedang dikembangkan dan dipersiapkan sebelum diproduksi secara massal atau diperjualbelikan secara bebas. Pada existing proses produksi Mesin Suspeed meliputi proses gambar desain, proses pembelian bahan baku, proses perakitan, proses inspeksi dan proses pengemasan. Dalam proses produksi mesin tersebut menerapkan assembly to order. Pada pengamatan awal terdapat kendala pada produksi Mesin Suspeed yaitu tidak memiliki dokumen sebagai acuan secara baku dalam sistem pengendalian kualitas dan hanya dilakukan inspeksi pada produk akhir (final inspection). Sehingga hal ini perlu dilakukan penelitian untuk merencanakan sistem pengendalian kualitas dalam pencegahan produk dan mengurangi risiko kegagalan pada proses produksinya untuk meningkatkan kualitas produk Mesin Suspeed. Metode yang digunakan dalam mengidentifikasi proses produksi Mesin Suspeed adalah failure modes, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA). Metode ini digunakan dalam mencegah kegagalan yang mungkin terjadi selama proses produksi dan mengidentifikasi risiko paling signifikan yang akan terjadi. FMECA merupakan kombinasi dari metode failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) yang menghasilkan nilai severity, occurrence dan detection serta criticality analysis (CA) yang memasukkan nilai severity dan occurrence pada matriks kritikal dalam mempertimbangkan kategori level atau tingkat risiko yang dibagi menjadi tiga yaitu low critical, medium critical dan high critical. Hasil kategori level atau tingkat risiko digunakan sebagai input peletakan titik inspeksi disetiap proses produksi dan dokumen quality inspection plan sebagai sistem pengendalian kualitas. Selain itu, metode yang digunakan dalam membantu mengidentifikasi sistem pengendalian kualitas adalah process decision program chart (PDPC) yang digunakan dalam memetakan rencana kegiatan berdasarkan masing-masing proses kritikal yang mungkin terjadi serta menanggulangi permasalahan dari risiko yang akan terjadi. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat beberapa kritikal proses yaitu high critical, medium critical dan low critical. Pada high critical diperoleh 6 proses, medium critical diperoleh 20 proses dan low critical diperoleh 25 proses. Hasil dari identifikasi kritikal proses digunakan dalam peletakan titik inspeksi dan quality inspection plan (QIP) sebagai prosedur dalam penginspeksian. Selain itu, Pada masing-masing kritikal proses diperoleh rekomendasi sistem pengendalian kualias dari hasil process decision program chart yaitu SOP, final checklist assembly, pelatihan pekerja, welding procedure specification (WPS), briefing, dokumen PDCA, perawatan alat atau mesin dan reward pekerja.

English Abstract

PT Brawijaya Smart Industri is a company that focuses on the manufacture of postharvest processing equipment and machinery. Currently, the company is engaged in product development and innovation for players in the food processing industry. This research focuses on the Suspeed Machine, where it is being developed and prepared before being mass produced or traded freely. The existing Suspeed Machine production process includes the design and drawing process, the process of purchasing raw materials, the assembly process, the inspection process, and the packaging process. In the production process, the machine implements assembly to order. In the initial observations, there were obstacles to the production of Suspeed Machines, namely the lack of documents as a standard reference in the quality control system and only carrying out inspections on the final product (final inspection). So it is necessary to do research to plan a quality control system for product prevention and reduce the risk of failure in the production process to improve the quality of Suspeed Machine products. The method used in identifying the production process of Suspeed Machines is Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA). This method is used for preventing failures that may occur during the production process and identifying the most significant risks that will occur. FMECA is a combination of the Failure, Mode, Effects, and Analysis (FMEA) method, which produces severity, occurrence, and detection values, as well as Criticality Analysis (CA), which includes severity and occurrence values in a critical matrix when considering the level category or level of risk, which is divided into three, namely low critical, medium critical, and high critical. The results of the category level or risk level are used as input for placing inspection points in each production process and documenting the quality inspection plan as a quality control system. In addition, the method used to help identify the quality control system is the Process Decision Program Chart (PDPC), which is used to map activity plans based on each critical process that may occur and overcome problems from risks that will occur. The results of this study indicate that there are several critical processes, namely high-, medium-, and low-critical processes. At high criticality 6 processes are obtained, medium criticality is obtained by 20 processes, and low criticality is obtained by 25 processes. The results of process critical identification are used in laying out inspection points, quality inspection plans, and inspection procedures. In addition, for each critical process, recommendations for quality control systems were obtained from the results of the process decision program chart, namely SOP, final checklist assembly, worker training, welding procedure specifications, briefings, PDCA documents, maintenance of tools or machines, and worker rewards

Item Type:	Thesis (Sarjana)
Identification Number:	0523070083
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Pengendalian Kualitas, Mesin Suspeed, FMECA, PDPC, Quality Inspection Plan. .- Quality Control, Suspeed Machine, FMECA, PDPC, Quality Inspection Plan
Subjects:	600 Technology (Applied sciences) > 670 Manufacturing
Divisions:	Fakultas Teknik > Teknik Industri
Depositing User:	PKN 02 UB
Date Deposited:	09 Jun 2023 06:34
Last Modified:	09 Jun 2023 06:34
URI:	http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/201339

Text (DALAM MASA EMBARGO) Muhammad Putra Nurdiansyah.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 31 December 2025. Download (6MB)

Actions (login required)

View Item