Wijaya, Wijaya (2021) Ratio Decidendi Hakim Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 149k/Pid.Sus/2013 Tentang Penyalah Guna Narkotika. Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
Narkotika merupakan suatu obat atau bahan yang bermanfaat di bidang pengobatan, pelayanan kesehatan dan pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan. Namun di sisi lain Narkotika dapat menimbulkan ketergantungan yang sangat merugikan apabila dipergunakan tanpa adanya pengendalian, pengawasan yang ketat dan secara seksama. Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi dengan adanya dua pasal yang dinilai multitafsir dan memiliki ketidakjelasan rumusan yaitu pada Pasal 112 dan Pasal 127 UU Narkotika. Pada pasal 112 tersebut tidak membedakan antara penyalah guna narkotika yang digunakan untuk diri sendiri dengan penyalah guna narkotika yang dalam hal ini memenuhi unsur ‘memiliki, menyimpan, menguasai, dan menyediakan’ untuk orang lain. Sehingga cakupan dalam pasal 112 dapat dikatakan lebih luas dibandingkan dengan makna penyalahguna dalam pasal 127. Dan mengakibatkan pasal 112 lebih mudah menjerat pelaku penyalah guna narkotika. Tujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini yakni Untuk mengetahui bagaimana Ratio Decidendi hakim dalam memutus pemidanaan terhadap penyalahguna narkotika dan bagaimana Implikasi yuridis terhadap penyalah guna narkotika atas putusan MA No. 149K/Pid.Sus/2013. Penulisan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (The Case Approach). Bahan hukum yang digunakan berupa bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier dengan teknik penelusuran bahan hukum menggunakan studi pustaka dan menganalisis bahan hukum tersebut dengan metode deduksi dan penafsiran. Hasil penelitian dalam penelitian ini adalah hakim dalam memutus pemidanaan terhadap penyalah guna narkotika pada putusan Mahkamah Agung no.149K/Pid.Sus/2013 adalah hakim lebih melihat bagaimana rumusan perbuatan dalam Pasal 112 Undang-undang Narkotika telah terpenuhi berdasarkan ditemukanya adanya alat bukti Narkotika. Implikasi yuridis terhadap penyalah guna narkotika atas putusan Mahkamah Agung no. 149k/pid.sus/2013 dapat disimpulkan bahwa seseorang yang dikenakan pasal 112 dan tidak dikenakan Pasal 127 dan Pasal 103 terhadap terdakwa mengakibatkan terdakwa yang seharusnya mendapatkan hak untuk melakukan Rehabilitasi sebagai langkah pengobatan tidak dapat melaksanakan rehabilitasi sebagai bagian dari masa pemidanaan.
English Abstract
Dandi Wijaya, Criminal Law, Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University, May 2021, Decidendi Ratio of Judges in the Supreme Court Decision Number 149k / Pid.Sus / 2013 concerning Narcotics Abuse, Dr. Setiawan Noerdayasakti, S.H., M.H. , Mufatikhatul Farikhah, S.H., M.H. In this research paper the author raises a problem that is motivated by the existence of two articles which are considered multiple interpretations and have unclear formulas, namely Article 112 and Article 127 of the Narcotics Law. In Article 112 does not distinguish between abusers of narcotics used for themselves and abusers of narcotics which in this case fulfill the elements of "possessing, keeping, controlling, and providing" for others. So that the coverage in article 112 can be said to be broader than the meaning of abuser in article 127. And it makes it easier for Article 112 to ensnare narcotics abusers. The author, in this case, raised the case on behalf of the defendant Julie Munthe to be the object of research that needed to be written and researched because in the Supreme Court's decision there was a judge who submitted a Dissenting opinion (DO). And this can provide an overview of how Judges examine, try and decide cases related to Narcotics abuse with several perspectives. Based on the cases, this paper raises the formulation of the problem: (1) How is the Decidendi Ratio of judges in deciding the conviction of narcotics abusers in the decision number.149K / Pid.Sus / 2013? (2) What are the juridical implications for narcotics abusers based on the Supreme Court decision Number. 149K / Pid.Sus / 2013? Then the writing in this research paper uses the normative juridical method with the statute approach and the case approach. The legal materials used are in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials with the technique of tracing legal materials using literature studies and analyzing the legal materials using deduction and interpretation methods. From the results of the research with the method, the writer obtained answers to the existing problems that the Decidendi Ratio of judges in deciding the conviction of narcotics abusers in the Supreme Court decision number 149K / Pid.Sus / 2013 is that the judge looks more at how the formulation of actions in Article 112 of the Law -The Narcotics Law has been fulfilled based on the discovery of the Narcotics evidence of the type of methamphetamine weighing 0.1 grams fulfills the formulation of the Article that the perpetrator has, keeps or controls the Narcotics Category I. And the Judge considered that the perpetrator was not a Narcotics abuser based on the information that at the time of the search the Defendant was not consuming or using Narcotics. Furthermore, the dissenting opinion (dissenting opinion) in the Supreme Court decision no.149K / Pid.Sus / 2013 on the grounds that the Defendant could be called a narcotics abuser based on the fact that the defendant both possessed, controlled and kept narcotics intended for personal consumption, and test results. The Defendant's urine was positive for the Narcotics in question. The juridical implication of narcotics abusers on the Supreme Court decision number 149k / pid.sus / 2013 it can be concluded that a person who is subject to Article 112 and not subject to Article 127 and Article 103 can be considered as not an abuser of Narcotics, because the imposition of Article 112 on the defendant resulted in the defendant who should have received the right to carry out rehabilitation as a treatment step. cannot carry out rehabilitation as part of detentionas periods stated in article 103 of the Narcotics Law.
Other obstract
-
| Item Type: | Thesis (Sarjana) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | 052101 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Ratio decidendi, Narkotika, Penyalahguna Narkotika |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 340 Law |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with username lilik |
| Date Deposited: | 27 Oct 2021 03:53 |
| Last Modified: | 23 Feb 2022 08:00 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/186093 |
![[thumbnail of DALAM MASA EMBARGO]](http://repository.ub.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (DALAM MASA EMBARGO)
Dandi Wijaya.pdf Restricted to Registered users only until 31 December 2023. Download (1MB) |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |