Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Atas Sita Jaminan Harta Pailit Dari Tindak Pidana

Wardhana, Oppy Pramudya Wisnu (2021) Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Atas Sita Jaminan Harta Pailit Dari Tindak Pidana. Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.

Abstract

Tulisan ini mengangkat permasalahan tentang perlindungan hukum kreditur atas sita jaminan harta pailit dari tindak pidana. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatis, dengan spesifikasi pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan analitis, dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan kurator apabila penyidik telah terlebih dahulu meletakkan sita atas harta pailit debitor pailit, sebelum putusan pernyataan pailit diucapkan adalah dengan mengajukan praperadilan sesuai dengan aturan dalam Pasal 82 ayat (3) huruf d. KUHAP, untuk menetapkan bahwa benda yang disita tidak termasuk alat pembuktian, sehingga benda sitaan tersebut harus segera dikembalikan kepada kurator. Atau kurator juga dapat mengajukan gugatan lain-lain, yang kemudian atas putusan gugatan lain-lain tersebut dapat diajukan upaya hukum Kasasi dan Peninjauan Kembali. Dalam melindungi hak kreditur dalam kasus kepailitan ini, kurator dapat mengajukan upaya praperadilan dengan dasar hukum Pasal 31 UU KPKPU, Pasal 6 UU Perbankan, Pasal 18 UU HT, Pasal 19 UU Tipikor, Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1731K/Pdt/2011 dan Pasal 115 UU PT.

English Abstract

In this thesis, the author raises the problem related to the guarantee confiscation provided by the debtor to the creditor. Collateral assets are collateral for repayment of debts when the debtor has problems and failed to pay in accordance with the account’s receivable agreement between the debtor and creditor. Based on the background of the research, there are two problem formulations: What are the legal consequences of the debtor's assets being the result of a criminal act? And what is the position of legal protection for creditors over general confiscation of the bankruptcy property as the revenue of a criminal act? Research at above uses a normative juridical approach using a mandatory guide approach (State Аpproаch) and an analytic approach (Аnаlyticаl Аpproаch). Primary Laws are obtained from the Legislation, while secondary and tertiary laws are obtained from books, documents or libraries and convictions. The law obtained by the author will be analyzed by the approach used to determine the meaning used in legislation conceptually, as well as knowing its application in two examinations, as a basis for judges' consideration in deciding cases regarding the legal status of collateral objects belonging to third parties in the debtor's bankruptcy. From the results of the research using the above method, the author gets an answer to the problem that's the Collateral Assets of the debtor's assets income from committing a crime that is confiscated by investigators based on Article 39 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code as evidence. In this case the curator can provide legal protection to creditors for the collateral affected by the criminal confiscation by submitting counter measures such as filing other claims at the Commercial Court, cassation and reconsideration of general confiscation of bankruptcy accompanied by criminal confiscation by the investigator or prosecutor. general. This is very possible because the criminal confiscation does not erase the 12 collateral value of the insurance rights attached to repayment of debtors' debts against creditors.

Other obstract

Item Type:	Thesis (Sarjana)
Identification Number:	052101
Subjects:	300 Social sciences > 340 Law
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User:	Unnamed user with username lilik
Date Deposited:	22 Oct 2021 04:41
Last Modified:	23 Feb 2022 04:08
URI:	http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/184962

Text (DALAM MASA EMBARGO)
OPPY PRAMUDYA WISNU WARDHANA.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only until 31 December 2023.
Download (5MB)

Actions (login required)

View Item