Rochman, Fadlu (2019) Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan di Indonesia dengan Amerika Serikat). Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
Pada penelitian ini penulis mengangkat permasalahan mengenai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam persperktif hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia. Mengenai penyelesaian sengketa persaingan usaha di Indonesia tidak dapat melalui Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa karena dalam regulasi mengenai penyelesaian sengketa persaingan usaha di Indonesia belum mencakup secara khusus hal tersebut. Apabila membahas terkait Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam penyelesaian sengketa persaingan usaha negara yang telah menerapkannya ialah Amerika Serikat. Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, maka permasalahan hukum yang dikemukakan dalam penelitian ini adalah apakah apakah sengketa persaingan usaha di Indonesia dapat diselesaikan melalui Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa apabila ditinjau dari perspektif hukum persaingan usaha dan bagaimana perbandingan konsep peraturan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam sengketa persaingan usaha di Indonesia dengan Amerika Serikat. Untuk menjawab permasalahan di atas, penelitian yang dilakukan adalah penelitian hukum yuridis-normatif serta menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan kasus, serta pendekatan komparatif. Bahan hukum yang digunakan yaitu bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Bahan hukum yang telah diperoleh dianalisis menggunakan metode interpretasi gramatikal, interpretasi sistematis, interpretasi komparatif yang didasari atas pengaturan hukum antar pasal dan huruf dari permasalahan hukum itu sendiri. Berdasarkan pembahasan, disimpulkan bahwa Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam sengketa persaingan usaha di Indonesia belum tidak dapat diterapkan karena belum ada peraturan khusus terkait hal tersebut. Apabila melihat penerapannya di Amerika Serikat, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa relevan diterapkan di Indonesia dalam sengketa privat persaingan usaha yang meliputi mediasi terharap klaim kerugian dan gugatan masal, sedangkan arbitrase dalam sengketa kerugian dan sengketa merger.
English Abstract
In this research the author raised the issue regarding the Alternative Dispute Resolution in the business competition law perspective in Indonesia. Regarding the resolution of business competition disputes in Indonesia, it cannot be through the Alternative Dispute Resolution because in the regulations concerning the settlement of business competition disputes in Indonesia it has not covered this matter specifically. When discussing about the Alternative Dispute Settlement in the resolution of business competition disputes that have implemented the United States.Based on this background, the legal issues raised in this study are what is the urgency of settling business competition cases in Indonesia through Alternative Dispute Resolution and how the concept of comparison of business competition case resolution regulations in Indonesia is related to Alternative Dispute Resolution with regulations in the United States. Based on this background, the legal issues raised in this study are whether the competition in Indonesia can be resolved through Alternative Dispute Resolution when viewed from the perspective of business competition law and how the comparison of alternative regulatory concepts in Dispute Settlement in business competition disputes in Indonesia and America Union.Based on the discussion, it was concluded that the Arrangement of Alternative Settlement in Case disputes was an urgent matter by looking at its application and the provisions of the regulations in Indonesia did not yet support regulating it. Regarding the Alternative Dispute Resolution in cases of business competition is something that is relevant if applied in Indonesia. To answer the above problems, the research carried out is juridical-normative legal research and uses a legislative approach, conceptual approach, case approach, and comparative approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Legal material that has been obtained is analyzed using the method of grammatical interpretation, systematic interpretation, comparative interpretation based on legal arrangements between articles and letters of the legal problem itself. Based on the discussion, it was concluded that the Alternative Settlement of Disputes in business competition disputes in Indonesia had not yet been implemented because there were no specific regulations related to this matter. When looking at its implementation in the United States, the relevant Alternative Dispute Resolution is applied in Indonesia in business competition private disputes which include mediation damages claims and class actions, while arbitration in a merger remedies and antitrust damages claims.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Sarjana) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | SKR/FH/2019/303/051908422 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | - |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 343 Military, defense, public property, public finance, tax, commerce (trade), industrial law > 343.07 Regulation of economic activity > 343.072 Unfair practices > 343.072 1 Antitrust law |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Endang Susworini |
| Date Deposited: | 16 Jul 2020 13:53 |
| Last Modified: | 17 Feb 2022 01:24 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/174701 |
Preview |
Text
Fadlu Rochman (2).pdf Download (2MB) | Preview |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |