Praneswulan, Maria Andrieta (2019) Akibat Hukum Putusnya Perkawinan Berdasarkan Putusan Anulasi Dari Pengadilan Gerejawi. Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
Perkаwinаn merupаkаn sаlаh sаtu bаgiаn dаri ibаdаt, corаk religiusitаs nаmpаk dаlаm ketentuan mengenаi syаrаt sаhnyа perkawinan. Konsekuensi yаng dihаrаpkаn dаri pemаknааn tersebut аdаlаh sedаri mulаinyа perkаwinаn, berlаngsungnyа, hinggа аpаbilа perkаwinаn berаkhir hаruslаh sesuаi dengаn hukum аgаmа аtаu setidаk-tidаknyа tidаk bertentаngаn dengаn hukum аgаmа, sehinggа perkаwinаn yаng merupаkаn sаlаh sаtu ibаdаt itu tidаk pudаr kesаkrаlаnnyа. Agama Kаtolik sendiri tidak mengenal adanya konsep perceraian, yang ada adalah pembatalan perkawinan atau yang disebut dengan Anulasi. Gerejа memiliki mekаnisme sendiri dаlаm mengаdili perkаrа terkait putusnya perkawinan. Proses Anulasi hаnyа bisа dilаkukаn melаlui proses perdаtа dalam Pengadilan Gerejаwi. Berdasarkan hal tersebut peneliti mengangkat rumusan masalah yaitu 1) Bagaimana Kedudukan Putusan Anulasi oleh Pengadilan Gerejawi di Indonesia? 2) Apa akibat hukum berakhirnya perkawinan tanpa Putusan Anulasi yang dikeluarkan Pengadilan Gerejawi? Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan Pendekatan Konseptual (Conceptual Approach), Pendekatan perundang-undangan (Statue Approach), Pendekatan Analitis (Analytical Approach). Jenis dan sumber bahan hukum meliputi Bahan Hukum Primer, Sekunder dan Tersier. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum dilakukan dengan melakukan library research melalui perpustakaan pusat Universitas Brawijaya, koleksi buku pribadi penulis dan melalui internet dengan mempelajari jurnal internasional atau website terpercaya. Teknik analisa bahan hukum menggunakan interpretasi sistematis dan konseptual. Dari penelitian dan analisis sesuai dengan metode diatas, maka peneliti memperoleh hasil penelitian dan jawaban dari rumusan masalah yang dikemukakan yakni: 1) Belum diakuinya eksistensi Pengadilan Gerejawi, karenanya putusan Anulasi tidak digunakan sebagai dasar putusan Hakim dalam memutus perkara perkawinan umat Katolik di Indonesia; 2) Secara agama, Perkawinan yang diputus tanpa Putusan Anulasi yang dikeluarkan oleh Pengadilan Gerejawi adalah tidak sah, sebab kewenangan memutus perkawinan umat katolik (Anulasi) hanya ada pada Pengadilan Gerejawi. Dan tanpa putusan Anulasi, secara agama mereka masih dianggap menikah dan masih diangggap sah sebagai pasangan suami istri.
English Abstract
Marriage is part of religious activity, symbolising religious characteristic, clearly reflected in the provisions regarding the valid requirement of marriage. The consequence of the definition is that the beginning of the marriage, during the marriage, or how the marriage ends must comply with religious rules or at least it should not violate the rules. From this understanding, it is expected that the marriage as a form of religious activity does not ruin the sacredness of the marriage. The Catholic do not recognise divorce, but the term commonly referred to is the cancellation of marriage or annulment. Churches have their own way to adjudicate cases regarding the marriage annulled. The process of annulment can only be enforced based on civil process in ecclesiastical courts. In reference to the above issue, this research is aimed to study the following research problems: 1) what is the position of Decision over Annulment by an Indonesian ecclesiastical court? 2) What is the legal consequence of ended marriage not based on the Decision of Annulment issued by an ecclesiastical court? This research is aimed to find out the position of Decision of Annulment made by an Ecclesiastical Court in Indonesia and its legal consequence of annulled marriage due to annulment made by the Ecclesiastical Court. Normative juridical methods were employed, supported by conceptual, statute, and analytical approaches. The legal materials involved primary, secondary, and tertiary data obtained from library research. From research and analysis in accordance with the above method, the researcher obtained the results of research and answers from the formulated problem, namely: 1) The existence of the ecclesiastical court was not recognized, therefore the Anulation decision was not used as a basis for the Judge's decision to decide on the marriage of Catholics in Indonesia; 2) Religion, Marriage which is decided without an Anulatory Decision issued by the Ecclesiastical Court is invalid, because the authority to decide on the marriage of Catholics (Anulasi) is only in the Church Court. And without an Anulation verdict, they are still considered religiously married and are still considered legitimate as a married couple
| Item Type: | Thesis (Sarjana) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | SKR/FH/2019/262/051908360 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | - |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 346 Private law > 346.01 Persons and domestic relations > 346.016 Marriage, partnerships, unions |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Endang Susworini |
| Date Deposited: | 08 Jul 2020 05:40 |
| Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2020 06:44 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/174406 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |