Dahlia, Arini Anggun (2019) Analisis Risiko Operasional Pada Bagian Pengadaan Perusahaan Agrokimia Menggunakan Metode Failure Mode And Effect Analysis (FMEA). Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
PT Petrosida Gresik merupakan perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang agroindustri yang menghasilkan produk kimia seperti pestisida dan pupuk. PT Petrosida merupakan anak perusahaan dari PT Petrokimia Gresik. Pada Bagian Pengadaan PT Petrosida Gresik masih belum optimal dalam pengelolaan operasional bagian pengadaannya dikarenakan masih banyak keterlambatan kedatangan bahan baku, ketidaksesuaian spesifikasi bahan baku yang diterima, pekerjaan yang tidak sesuai dengan prosedur, serta kegiatan operasional lain yang masih terdapat kesalahan dalam pelaksanaannya yang berkaitan dengan bagian pengadaan. Oleh karena itu, dari permasalahan tersebut dicari apa penyebab, indikasi risiko akan terjadinya, dampak dan solusi pemecahan dari permasalahan tersebut menggunakan metode failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA). Identifikasi risiko dilakukan brainstroming dengan bantuan metode risk breakdown structure (RBS) untuk mengelompokkan risiko dari level 0-3. Sebelumnya, dilakukan pemetaan aktivitas pada bagian pengadaan yang terbagi 4 proses yaitu perencanaan, pemesanan, penerimaan, dan pengembalian bahan baku untuk memudahkan dalam memahami bagaimana aktivitas bagian pengadaan di perusahaan. Metode failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) digunakan untuk analisis risiko, penilaian risiko dan penanganan risiko. Hasil severity, occurrence, dan detection dibuat kuesioner yang bertujuan untuk memberikan penilaian terhadap setiap indikator risiko yang telah teridentifikasi. Hasil kuesioner diolah untuk mengetahui risiko kritis yang ada pada bagian pengadaan. Risiko kritis diperoleh dari nilai risk priority number (RPN) tertinggi sehingga selanjutnya dilakukan risk response planning dalam penanganannya. Berdasarkan nilai risk priority number (RPN) diketahui bahwa terdapat 4 nilai indikator risiko kritis yang diperlukan usulan rekomendasi penanganan. Keempat indikator risiko kritis diperoleh sesuai rata-rata nilai kritis yaitu sebesar 263,52 dengan total RPN dibagi dengan jumlah potential failure. Risiko kritis pada bagian pengadaan adalah stock bahan baku di gudang melimpah disebabkan kapasitas gudang tidak memadai dengan nilai RPN sebesar 276,00, adanya selisih stock bahan baku pada rekap pencatatan dengan stock fisik di gudang disebabkan ketidaktelitian karyawan saat menginput stock bahan baku dengan nilai RPN sebesar 275,15, keterlambatan kedatangan bahan baku dan bahan baku yang diterima tidak sesuai yang diinginkan perusahaan yang keduanya disebabkan kendala dari pemasok dengan nilai RPN masing-masing sebesar 339,44 dan 273,78. Usulan perbaikan untuk risiko kritis yang ada pada bagian pengadaan menerapkan strategi risk acceptance yaitu penataan ulang penyimpanan bahan baku di gudang, penerapan stockless purchase system dan penjadwalan pengiriman pengadaan (sistem kanban pemasok) serta menerapkan strategi risk mitigation yaitu pengetikan dengan pemeriksaan ulang, perhitungan stok (stock opname), penggunaan barcode scanner, adanya kontrak kerja dengan pemasok, pemilihan pemasok lebih selektif, pengkajian ulang evaluasi kinerja pemasok, dan pengecekan spesifikasi bahan baku secara optimal.
English Abstract
PT Petrosida Gresik is a agroindustry company that produces chemical products such as pesticides and fertilizer. PT Petrosida Gresik is a subsidiary of PT Petrokimia Gresik. The Procurement Section of PT Petrosida Gresik is still not optimal in the operational management of its procurement section because there are still many delays in the arrival of raw materials, incompability of raw material specifications, the task that performed by employees does not follow appropriate procedures and other operational activities there was an error in its implementation relating to the procurement section. Therefore, from the problem can be found what causes, indications of risk will occur, the impact and solution to solve the problem using Failure Mode And Effect Analysis (FMEA) Method. Risk identification is done with brainstroming using Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) Method to classify the risks from level 0-3. Previously, activity mapping in the procurement section was divided into 4 processes, such as planning, ordering, receiving, and returning raw materials to understanding how the actually activities of the procurement section in the company. Failure Mode And Effect Analysis (FMEA) Method is used for risk analysis, risk assesment and risk management. The results of severity, occurrence, and detection are made questionnaries that aim to provide an assesment of each risk indicator that has been identified. The results of the questionnaire were processed to determine the critical risks in the procurement section. Critical risk is obtained from the highest risk priority number (RPN) so next, the risk response planning is carried to handling it. Based on the value of the risk priority number (RPN), it is known that there are 4 critical risk indicator values that are required to propose treatment recommendations. The four critical risk indicators are obtained according to the average critical value of 263,52 with the total RPN divided by the number of potential failure. The critical risk in the procurement section is the stock of raw materials are abundant in the warehouses due to inadequate warehouse capacity with RPN value of 276,00, the difference in raw material stock in the recording recap with physical stock in the warehouse due to inaccuracy of employees when inputting raw material stock with RPN value of 275,15, the delay in the arrival of raw materials and raw materials received is not as desired by the company, both of which are caused by constraints from suppliers with RPN value of 339,44 and 273,78. The proposed improvement for critical risk in the procurement section applies risk acceptance strategies, that is rearranging storage of raw materials in warehouse, applying stockless purchase systems and scheduling procurement delivery (supplier kanban system) and implementing risk mitigation strategies that are typing with re-inspection, stock opname, the use of barcode scanners, employment contract with the supplier, more selective in supplier selection, review of supplier performance evaluations, and optimal checking of raw material specifications.
Other obstract
-
| Item Type: | Thesis (Sarjana) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | SKR/FT/2019/802/051907730 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Risiko Operasional, Bagian Pengadaan, Risk Breakdown Structure, Failure Mode And Effect Analysis, Operational Risk, Procurement Section, Risk Breakdown Structure, Failure Mode And Effect Analysis. |
| Subjects: | 600 Technology (Applied sciences) > 628 Sanitary engineering > 628.1 Water supply > 628.16 Testing analysis, treatment, pollution countermeasures > 628.161 Testing and analysis / Groundwater--Pollution--Measurement |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Teknik > Teknik Industri |
| Depositing User: | Budi Wahyono Wahyono |
| Date Deposited: | 28 Jul 2020 05:59 |
| Last Modified: | 04 Jan 2023 03:20 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/173773 |
![[thumbnail of Arini Anggun Dahlia (2).pdf]](http://repository.ub.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Arini Anggun Dahlia (2).pdf Download (2MB) |
![[thumbnail of Generate index codes conversion from text to indexcodes]](http://repository.ub.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/other.png) |
Other (Generate index codes conversion from text to indexcodes)
indexcodes.txt Download (0B) |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |