Ramadhan, Adam (2019) Batasan Itikad Baik Dalam Doktrin Business Judgement Rule Bagi Direksi Perseroan Terbatas (Studi Perbandingan Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas Dengan Australian Corporation Act (2001)). Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Abstract
Skripsi ini berupaya mengangkat permasalahan mengenai batasan itikad baik dalam doktrin business judgement rule bagi direksi perseroan terbatas (studi perbandingan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas dan Australian Corporation Act (2001)). Latar belakang penelitian ini terkait pada ketidakjelasan batasan seorang direksi dapat dikatakan telah melakukan itikad baik dalam setiap keputusan bisnis yang dilakukannya, khususnya didalam hukum positif di Indonesia. Pada dasarnya, Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas belum mengatur secara jelas mengenai penjelasan tentang batasan itikad baik dalam Business Judgement Rule. Berangkat dari permasalahan di atas, maka permasalahan hukum yang dikemukakan dalam penelitian ini adalah tentang batasan seorang direksi dinilai telah beritikad baik dalam pengambilan keputusan yang mereka buat sehingga dampak dari keputusan yang mereka buat tersebut dapat dilindungi oleh business judgement rule. Untuk menjawab permasalahan diatas, penelitian normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach) dan pendekatan komparatif (comparative approach). Bahan hukum yang berhubungan dengan masalah yang diteliti diperoleh melalaui penelusuran kepustakaan. Bahan-bahan hukum hukum yang telah diperoleh dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode intepretasi dan metode komparatif sehingga dapat disajikan dalam penulisan yang lebih sistematis guna menjawab isu hukum yang telah dirumuskan. Berdasarkan hasil pembahasan, diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa batasan itikad baik dalam UUPT tidak diatur secara jelas, namun demikian dengan perbandingan pada Australian Corporation Act (2001) peneliti dapat menyimpulkan bahwa jawaban dari batasan itikad baik bagi direksi adalah selama direksi memenuhi kewajiban untuk dipercaya (fiduciary duty), kewajiban untuk melaksanakan pengurusan dengan benar (duty to act for a proper purpose), kewajiban untuk mentaati peraturan perundang-undangan (statutory duty), kewajiban untuk loyal kepada perseroan terbatas (loyalty duty), dan kewajiban untuk menghindari kepentingan pribadi (duty to avoid conflict of interest).
English Abstract
This thesis seeks to raise issues regarding the limits of good faith in the doctrine of the business judgment rule for directors of limited liability companies (a comparative study of Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies and the Australian Corporation Act (2001)). The background of this study relates to the ambiguity of the boundaries of a director who can be said to have done good faith in every business decision he made, especially in positive law in Indonesia. Basically, the Limited Liability Company Law has not clearly stipulated an explanation of the limits of good faith in the Business Judgment Rules. Departing from the above problems, the legal issues raised in this study are about the limits of a director who is considered to have good intentions in the decisions they make so that the impact of the decisions they make can be protected by the business judgment rule. To answer the problems above, this normative study uses a statue approach and a comparative approach. Legal materials related to the problem under study are obtained through library search. legal materials that have been obtained are analyzed using interpretation methods and comparative methods so that they can be presented in more systematic writing to answer legal issues that have been formulated. Based on the results of the discussion, it was concluded that the limits of good faith in the Company Law were not clearly regulated, however, with a comparison to the Australian Corporation Act (2001) researchers could conclude that the answer to the good faith limit for directors was as long as the directors fulfilled their obligations (fiduciary duty) , the obligation to carry out the management properly (duty to act for a proper purpose), the obligation to obey the laws and regulations (statutory duty), the obligation to be loyal to a limited company (loyalty duty), and the obligation to avoid personal interests (duty to avoid conflict of interest).
| Item Type: | Thesis (Sarjana) |
|---|---|
| Identification Number: | SKR/FH/2018/475/051901899 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Batasan Itikad Baik, Business Judgement Rule, Direksi, Perseroan Terbatas.-Limitation of Good Faith, Business Judgment Rules, Directors, Limited Liability Companies. |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 346 Private law > 346.06 Organizations (Associations) > 346.066 Corporations (Companies) > 346.066 8 Kinds of corporations (Kinds of companies) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | soegeng sugeng |
| Date Deposited: | 20 May 2020 00:25 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Nov 2023 03:30 |
| URI: | http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/167823 |
![[thumbnail of Adam Ramadhan.pdf]](http://repository.ub.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Adam Ramadhan.pdf Download (1MB) |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |